Mr.Abbas's bleak future

Submitted by Marcos Berenstein (Brazil), Jan 16, 2005 at 19:55

Since it was invented by Nasser,the so-called PLO used to receive funds from various,evil sources such as the Communist Empire (Soviet Union and its lackeys) and from Arab dictatorships and medieval-minded kingdoms such as Saudi Arabia and a bullied,threatened of invasion Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan(former Transjordan).

Jordan,a country whose borders were drawn straight out from British Foreign Office's employees fertile minds in order to please its ally,'king' Abdullah,who realizing the foolishness of fighting the powerful,well-organized Jewish Army,conceded that peace was the wiser thing to do.

What happened to this enlightened Arab?WAS MURDERED BY A 'PALESTINIAN' inside the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.
Since him,no Arab leader DARED to speak for peace with Israel,until SADAT did that amazing trip to Jerusalem.After Camp David,Israel gave back the Sinai Peninsula to the Egyptians and what happened afterwards?Sadat WAS MURDERED by the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.

Arafat knew that what Barak did offer to the 'Palestinians' was much more than he expected.He also realized that settling a quasi-permanent,final peace treaty with Israel could mean something ominous to himself...DEATH,or even worse,CIVIL WAR in his imaginary country.Then,he turned to Clinton and Barak,and said 'NO' and unleashed a deadly intifada against Israel in response of a real peaceful solution for both.

Mr.Abbas will of course,as a good history buff (Remember that he discovered that Jews invented the Holocaust in order to inflict the 'Nakhba' to his brethren?) avoid the mistakes of Abdullah and Nasser and follow his former capo,Abu Ammar's stance towards this dangerous thing called peace with the 'zionist enemy'....

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".