Andrew Whitehead.....Anti-CAIR

Submitted by Dvora (United States), Jul 28, 2005 at 19:41

Andrew Whitehead, hopefully, will win this suit that CAIR has placed against him. Andrew is an exemplary man, retired Military, who took the issue of Islamic aggression, and attempts to usurp the Constitution of the United States by extremists as an act of sedition, against not just the Government of the United States, but the people and the will of the people, to not be governed by muslim extremists. Mazel Tov to Andrew Whitehead.

I cannot say this enough about Dr. Pipes, personally. When Andrew Whitehead was initially served by CAIR with the intent to sue Andy, Dr. Pipes came to his assistance almost immediately, and in a way none of us could possibly match. Because of his extensive knowledge of the terrorist connection to CAIR, I am sure, both Andy and his Attorneys benefitted tremendously from Dr. Pipes wealth of knowledge on CAIR's terrorist ties, which included times, dates, names, and American Government Agencies and States involved in the Prosecutorial aspects against CAIR members.

Dr. Pipes, I think highly of you for that, because Andrew was deeply concerned about the aspects of losing everything he ever worked for. As you know, Anti-CAIR was a farely new Internet site, and Andy put alot of himself, and his life substance into Anti-CAIR because he, and WE believed him to be a necessity and a wealth of information into the current actions of CAIR that many people did not know.

I sincerely hope Andrew countersues CAIR for putting him thru much unnecessary grief and worry, and Dr. Pipes, you are one of the best people for assisting Andrew the way you did.

I will always remember you acted in the capacity of Mench to Andrew Whitehead, and I am sure he knows it as well.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".