The toxic brew of Islamists and the Regressive Left

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 26, 2017 at 09:44

Dr Pipes

Maajid Nawaz is the one who coined the term: The Regressive Left and welcome to the world of these neo-Fascists It is the strange world of the toxic brew of Islamism and the Regressive Left where a California Sheikh tells his followers to annihilate the Jews and a few days later Jewish and Christian clergies come to the rescue and all sing Kumbaya It is also the world of the likes of Time magazine and WaPo telling us that the word Jihad means some inner struggle because Linda Sarsour says so This really means that Muhammad and al-Khulafa' al-Rashiduun and al-Mufasereen did not get the correct meaning of the world Jihad and some kafir reporter from Time or WaPo knows the real meaning Absolute insanity

But again what should we expect when the likes of Obama and GW Bush tell us that Islam is the religion of peace and HR McMaster tells us that Daesh is not the real Islam

But the reality is the truth never goes away and it is Islam is a political system not unlike communism and this is what has to be addressed I would go one more step and demand that Muslims fix the hate and violence in Islam

Muslims? They are also victims of Islam

We all remember when Hillary Clinton blamed the director of the Muhammad's video for the Benghazi atrocity when in fact we can find the story of the video is Hadith al-Mab'ath word for word This really means that the director was accused of being an "Islamophobe" when in fact the source of this embarrassing fable is in the Islamic sources

>"right-wing think tank with a long history of hostility toward Islam."

What is being "right wing"? The old Left defended freedom of speech The new Regressive Left wants to impose limits on speech And if by believing in Freedom of Speech (Brandenburg v Ohio Nazi Party of America v Skokie) and if this means that I'm now a right wing follower so be it

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".