Response to No Dhimmi

Submitted by Maggie (Australia), Aug 4, 2005 at 05:31

No Dhimmi,

thank you for taking the time to post this information. I have been reading your comments with interest, for you are providing some very interesting details that indicate to me that there are many Muslims who may speak with a forked tongue.

I believe that this is right on with regards to what I am witnessing in Australia. What they want is complete control over the government in Australia. I feel certain that if the terrorist cells had an opportunity that they would put their plan into action.

It is not well known that there had been a plot to cause disruption at the Sydney Olympics in the year 2000. However, the terrorists did not get to carry out their plot because they were discovered and the plan was foiled. There have been some recent incidents where potential terrorists have been caught with some very incriminating evidence that pointed to some of their plans to cause disruption. Again they were foiled.

However, the cells continue to exist and when the recruiters of terror are going so far as to speak openly in the mosques as well as calling public meetings and continuing to spread their hatred. The most well known mosque for ferment in Sydney is Lakemba, with Auburn a close second. In Melbourne there are several mosques that are of interest to the special agents, especially the one at Hoppers Crossing, and another at Preston. The extremists have been attempting to recruit the young but the Imams have been successful in preventing the hate speeches. The Islamic Council here in Australia is very co-operative with the government and they have been vocal in condemning the acts of terror.

That does not mean that I feel I can trust these people since I do not know which way they will go if there was a war declared. What I do know is that it is a mischaracterisation to claim that the west declared war on Islam by invading Iraq. That country was controlled by a cold-blooded dictator.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".