Exectuve Decisions - Whose Orders Should Be Observed - The Holy or Unholy

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Apr 4, 2021 at 15:49

One cannot help but feel the concern in Prashant's apprehension in what disaster is impending in the 46th American Administrative Chief Executive's office; for it is American law that gave the 45th American Administrative Chief Executive the authority to make that recognition of Jerusalem's place as Israel's capitol; does the law allow for recanting that actions? Would it not be anti-Semitic to return to a previous stance of interfering in Israeli sovereignty(?); not that it could ever be taken back without serious consequences, for both the United States, as well as for the other enemies of Israel.
The world is at a place that too few realize is so full of jeopardy, it is unimaginable the tragedies that are already in play and are on the threshold of being played out for the renewed ambitions of empire.
The alliances being renewed from before the Presidency of President Trump are ample evidences of the ignorance of so many previous administrative attempts to formulate an anti-national form of governance, coupled with the unstable attempts to isolate Israel from her place in world societies; it is amazing how correct, even in extreme accuracy, the Hebrew Holy Script brings to the forefront what is about to occur.
Prashant's observance may be deadly on point; who will be able to withstand the consequences if he turns out to be right.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".