Ten Years Later - Purge of Intellectualism by Technology Still Parabolic

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Jun 17, 2021 at 14:29

Tandem to and complicit under the view of Dr. Pipes' narrative on infiltrations of anti-culture into mainstream academia and the contemporary actions of eradication of non-compliant philosophies and ideologies, we can better see how the nation was deluded into believing radical changes were necessary to be in better alignment with the efforts to win the world's battle towards a lawless unified world order in defiance to the peaceful alternative sought by more conservative law abiding adherents of civil society.
Ten years later (note that the corruption of the banking industry under a false narrative of non-compliant financial institutions was taken over in criminal conduct in collusion to out-of-control government), America has faired quite poorly. All those years in an observed desperation of hoping for some reprieve from government overreach-like the 44th America Administrations' Obamacare that was given a new lease for oppression by SCOTUS-that with a brief respite by the 45th American Administrations' break in leftist ambitions, America has been taken past that and of such there is to be no more such reprieve.
Now, how does that comport with the technological impact America is under threat for ten years later?
Geneva is the clue, if one knows what to look for. Again, the Middle East is the focus, especially when understanding how easy it is for American technology to be compromised and technologically based infrastructure appears forthcoming from, of all places, Israel. How will that new government fare here?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".