We Must return to a "Crusade" Doctrine,and not Just to a "Just War" Doctrine.

Submitted by Mark Kerezman (United States), Mar 11, 2006 at 09:12

Submitted by Clifford Ishii, Mar 9, 2005 at 17:49

Militant Biblical Christianity is what is needed to counter militant islam and militant secular humanism.


I personally agree with you clifford. Christianity must return to its medieval origins. And stop fooling around with "Pacifism". Love of God demands that we sacrifice all to protect those we love. The "Crusade"Idea I think should be revived and liberal christianity should be thrown in the dustbin of history.Many people misuse jesus' Teachings on "Love your enemies" matt 5:44. Carl schimtt says in his book "The concept of the Political" That the latin New testament reads "diligente inimicos vestros"(Love your personal enemies) not "Diligente hostes vestros"(Love your Public enemies). A Personal enemy is a christian who hates the church. While a public enemy is a heathen that fights the church.

I would like to leave a quote from the bible with my comments:In APOCALYPSE otherwise known as "The Book of Revelation": (Rev 13:10) "He that shall lead into captivity, shall go into captivity: he that shall kill by the sword, must be killed by the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints." This verse clearly suggests to those under Proper Authority, that they have the right to use the sword in war.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".