69 million page views

Reply to David John

Reader comment on item: Civil war likely in Iraq: Pipes
in response to reader comment: Can't see the Forest for the Trees

Submitted by Jason (United States), Mar 13, 2006 at 07:43

David John asks:
"isn't it true that the ayatollas from Khomeni onwards have gone back to the Koran and found there the the doctrines of jihad, of Islamic superiority, of murder and mayhem."

It's actually just the opposite. These "leaders" are basing most of their BS on hadiths and fatwas, both of which are the Muslim equivalent of Papal Encyclicals. And just like the Papal Encyclicals, the historical hadiths and fatwas are merely the written religious beliefs of a single individual, at a specific point in time, and often have no basis in the underlying scriptures. Most of what is quoted here as being from the Koran is actually from these hadiths and fatwas, and not from the Koran at all. As I stated in my original posting, even Mohammad warned against using hadiths as a basis for one's faith, to include hadiths the he, Mohammad, had written. Only the Koran matters.

Remember also that the ayatollas are the Islamic equivalent of the Church leadership, albeit not so formally structured. They are the old guard, committed to the old ways, whether the old ways are right or not. The present wave of violence is their attempt to re-assert these old ways as this new generation finds that there is a discrepency between what they are taught by their religious leaders, and what is written in the Koran. This is an exact repeat of what happened during the Christian Reformation.

I have two final analogies that I believe will help people understand this a little better. During the Christian Reformation, two entities arose in an attempt to enforce the old order. They were the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), and the Inquisition. Islam has its own versions of each. They are, repectively, Wahabism (Islam's most fanatical branch) and Al-Qaida.

The Wahabi are like the Jesuits in that their version of their faith is based entirely upon the "traditions" of their religion, with little direct connection to their scriptures. It is the worst kind of blind, maniacal faith that allows people to be so easily manipulated by their leaders. Al-Qaida mirrors the Inquisition in that both were/are willing to do whatever is necessary to protect those traditions, no matter how evil such actions might have to be. Protecting the traditions and the established order are all that matter. Whereas most of the Catholic Church's inquisitors are probably burning in Hell, most members of Al-Qaida will probably share the same eternal fate. They'll have a lot of war stories to swap.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (61) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
US Must Resist Temptation to Leave Iraq [384 words]William Robert JackMar 20, 2006 14:5940814
To Harrak, Mu'een and Bader Islam is a religion of Peace [343 words]InfidelMar 12, 2006 14:4039858
Islam and the losers in the west! [173 words]HarrakMar 14, 2006 13:5639858
1Islam is the future? What future? [511 words]EarlybirdMar 14, 2006 17:4739858
Earlybird! I like your take except for some points.. [447 words]HARRAKMar 14, 2006 22:5639858
1Response to Harrak [333 words]EarlybirdMar 15, 2006 19:4939858
RE:Harrak.... [271 words]WeAreAllDanes!Mar 16, 2006 01:3039858
To Harrak, Mu'een and Bader - Islam is a religion of Peace [330 words]VijayMar 16, 2006 06:3439858
Earlbird, it's nice to see someone esle who understands [345 words]JasonMar 16, 2006 13:0939858
Reply for Earlybird and WeAreALLdanes [46 words]HARRAKMar 16, 2006 13:4639858
RE:HARRAK's non-reply [49 words]WeAreAllDanes!Mar 17, 2006 14:0939858
1Naaaaa..... [207 words]DunkelOct 24, 2011 12:0739858
Can't see the Forest for the Trees [941 words]JasonMar 10, 2006 13:4539636
Reply to Jason - Can't see the forest for the trees [275 words]David JohnMar 11, 2006 13:0839636
Reply to David John [412 words]JasonMar 13, 2006 07:4339636
Can't see the forest for the trees - reply to Jason [339 words]David JohnMar 14, 2006 11:3639636
Is the Koran really worse than the Bible [284 words]JasonMar 15, 2006 14:1139636
RE: lost in the forest [72 words]WeAreAllDanes!Mar 16, 2006 01:3639636
Still not seeing the forest for the trees [584 words]JasonMar 16, 2006 11:4439636
I agree [27 words]PCMadnessMar 17, 2006 19:3039636
RE:apologetics [489 words]WeAreAllDanes!Mar 18, 2006 12:0939636
to Jason - re forest for the trees. [260 words]RashidMar 19, 2006 15:3639636
Islam is different [231 words]Joe"Jun 14, 2006 12:1139636
Educative Information [24 words]Kakuru RobertAug 21, 2007 05:2039636
Civil War in Iraq [139 words]Heather ClarkMar 8, 2006 23:0639456
1Iraq, the harder game than that of Lebanon [459 words]HARRAKMar 8, 2006 11:4539375
Cohabitation [78 words]Bader SMar 8, 2006 17:3739375
Response for Badr- the proverb of the stupid and the proud [343 words]HarrakMar 9, 2006 13:2339375
Sources please Harrak... [172 words]PCMadnessMar 8, 2006 04:5939331
Sources! [72 words]HARRAKMar 8, 2006 17:2939331
Sorry Harrak, None the wiser I'm afraid. [241 words]PCMadnessMar 9, 2006 02:3439331
Sabians, Assyrians and Christians are NOT Muslims if you are wise PCMadness!! [42 words]HarrakMar 9, 2006 13:0239331
Harrak, Though provoking isn't it? [313 words]PCMadnessMar 9, 2006 20:2039331
Collin Powel and PCMadness! [89 words]HarrakMar 11, 2006 13:3839331
Harrak, words almost fail me. [355 words]PCMadnessMar 11, 2006 19:4239331
pdmadness, proverb for you! [32 words]HarrakMar 12, 2006 11:4539331
Agree to disagree.... I think [11 words]PCMadnessMar 13, 2006 14:5639331
Just goes to show you... [52 words]Ariton MarkuMar 7, 2006 11:5839191
A little analogy [82 words]Ray DanielsMar 6, 2006 04:1739036
Black Americans-White Americans----Both Christians?? [59 words]DWMar 6, 2006 17:2539036
Black and White [145 words]yuval brandstetter MDMar 7, 2006 09:4439036
Nothing new [123 words]Arvind MadhavanMar 4, 2006 19:3838912
Nothing new... [140 words]TMoneyRockMar 7, 2006 12:0738912
Dear TMoneyRock: Here is another rhyme [165 words]Arvind MadhavanMar 9, 2006 21:4038912
1an expression of relief [119 words]Jason HansfordMar 4, 2006 13:0738869
Democratic fetishism [348 words]Reuben HorneMar 4, 2006 02:2938832
Bleeding hearts to prevail. [255 words]renchMar 3, 2006 17:0438805
An Iraqi Civil war is still a failure [427 words]Ben ShniperMar 6, 2006 14:5838805
Dr Pipes is correct [111 words]donvanMar 3, 2006 15:5038796
1An Important Distinction between India and Pakistan [83 words]Mrgrinchman2001Mar 3, 2006 10:3838767
2Another difference between India and Pakistan [86 words]SteevMar 5, 2006 09:4738767
..a golden opportunity for Iran again, regardless of the double standard issue! [238 words]HarrakMar 5, 2006 23:3738767
An environment in which they can thrive [165 words]Bader SMar 7, 2006 02:0538767
True [180 words]VijayMar 7, 2006 12:2938767
Bader S Tell the whole story [94 words]InfidelMar 7, 2006 15:0038767
correcting my blabing friend the infidel [332 words]HARRAKMar 7, 2006 21:3538767
To Bader S. & Vijay [288 words]faqiMar 8, 2006 01:1338767
It's a mess, but so's Harraks response [107 words]PCMadnessMar 8, 2006 04:5738767
To Bader S. & Vijay [273 words]VijayMar 8, 2006 06:3038767
Re:Bader S Tell the whole story [106 words]Bader SMar 8, 2006 09:0638767
To faqi [265 words]Bader SMar 8, 2006 16:5038767

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)