69 million page views

You are wrong again

Reader comment on item: Casey, Santorum and Jerusalem
in response to reader comment: The threefold impact of Jerusalem

Submitted by true believer (India), Jun 16, 2006 at 07:01

Russia supports Iran for the same reason as China does, it wants to have a role in the middle east and not because of of the influence of any Orthodox Church. If that were really the case, Russians would not have egged on the Serbs to massacre moslems.

All Orthodox churches from Antioch to Georgia to Ukraine and Russia ( including Armenia ) have a history of persecutions by moslems, mainly the Turks and pan-turkic communities, there is hardly any love lost between them. They do not see moslems as protectors of Christians. I can say this because I myself belong to one of the eastern Syrian Churches.

Had that really been the case, Armenian holocaust would never have taken place. Why did many Arab christians migrate from Syria to US after the Arab-Israeli war ? Christians and moslems are not exactly kissing each other in Lebanon. Churches in the Middle east, whether in Egypt, Syria or Iraq are not taking sides with the Jews just because it could be very dangerous for them. As of today they are facing persecutions from islamofacists. And Moslems are least concerned about Christians, otherwise palestinian terrorists would not have used the Church of nativity as a toilet when they occupied it. Christians in the Armenian quarter of Jerusalem are living as peacefully as ever under Jewish rule.

Iran supported Armenia because Turkey supported Azerbaijan. Iran and Turkey were traditional contestants for influence in that region. Turkey leaned towards the west, joined the NATO and shook hands with Israel while Iran went over to the Russian and Chinese camps after the revoluion. I heard some time in January this year that an Armenian Airlines plane landed in Tel Aviv for the first time in many years. Relations between Israel and Armenia have only improved since then. It seems Armenians have finally realised that it is better not to rely solely on Iran for future support.

If Jerusalem continues Israeli rule, the wailing wall, Al Aksa, the Church of Nativity and every shrine that belongs to any community will be protected by law of the land. Leave it to moslems and they will knock down everything except the "dome of the rock" into a parking lot. When moslems take over governments, minorities lose most of their rights. I believe that all Christians understand this very well.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Progressives admitted: Ahmad Shukeiri assured 'throwing Jews into sea' was literal [216 words]DaliaJun 18, 2021 08:17268409
1When Shukairy admitted his pre six-day war call throwing "the Jews into sea" [143 words]ElyJul 5, 2020 08:03259535
Totally agree, I live in Europe and it does not work otherwise [139 words]IgnacioJun 21, 2006 15:1748009
Capital [238 words]John RJun 17, 2006 13:0547834
A modest proposal [305 words]Jon - a brit in EurolandJun 16, 2006 09:4247762
You are wrong Harrak, Christians are victims in both cases but more victims with Muslims [49 words]AnwarJun 15, 2006 21:2847737
Casey should have and probably did know [100 words]Stuart M BliwasJun 15, 2006 19:4347734
Don't Hold Your Breath [50 words]BlackspeareJun 15, 2006 18:1047732
happy endings [180 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDJun 15, 2006 16:0247728
The threefold impact of Jerusalem [266 words]HarrakJun 14, 2006 21:1347690
You are wrong again [391 words]true believerJun 16, 2006 07:0147690
You argument has a hole..better cover it next time [375 words]HarrakJun 16, 2006 19:3947690
Your argument itself is a BIG hole [472 words]true believerJun 19, 2006 10:0747690
My argument has a big hole in which you fell! [198 words]HarrakJun 19, 2006 17:5547690
Your hole is getting bigger than your argument [385 words]true believerJun 21, 2006 05:1047690
entertainment value! [89 words]HarrakJun 25, 2006 13:2947690
Excellent entertainment! [77 words]AdmirerJun 26, 2006 02:3847690
re: entertainment value [228 words]true believerJun 26, 2006 07:2847690

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)