re: entertainment value

Submitted by true believer (India), Jun 26, 2006 at 07:28

I suppose you have not stopped twisting or shaking after reading my previous post. Apart from entertainment , your ideas are not worth much though you yourself sound a bit too over-confident. Humour and sarcasm are two different things, don't mistake one for the other. Just because you have the heart of a child... does'nt mean that people must accept your arguments at their face value. This is a compliment, no offence intended. You know, real people with real ideas largely ignore your comments except at times under extreme provocation.

>>Your original fantasy "I personally seem to believe that Eastern church sees in Muslims as being the guardians of the Christian legacy in Palestine-Israel."

..is stretchhhhhhhhing imagination beyond all imaginable limits. if it were intended as humour, I admit that I completely missed it.

>>You said "The idea here is that Jerusalem is good for the 3 religions and not exclusively for one"

My response as usual "Jerusalem will continue to be good for all religions, provided it does not fall into moslem hands" Moslems can NEVER be trusted to ensure this, given their dubious track record till date. Moslems will always want Jerusalem exclusively for themselves. Period.

Happy to see that you are attempting to be rational without anyone ordering you to ;-) It's a welcome change. This way you will command some respect.

..all the best.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".