69 million page views

Capital

Reader comment on item: Casey, Santorum and Jerusalem

Submitted by John R (United States), Jun 17, 2006 at 13:05

+++++++ I was not the only one to be dismayed by the comments of U.S. Senate hopeful Robert P. Casey Jr., soon after his return from Israel a few months back.++++++++

Many Jews are.

++++++++It was disappointing that Casey, having seen the situation for himself, failed to come out and endorse Israel's right to choose its own capital city, a privilege that Washington grants every other single state on earth. It was also disappointing that Casey did not urge the U.S. government to follow the law of the land, which requires that the American embassy to Israel be located in Jerusalem.++++++++

It's ridiculous. Israel is a country, isn't it? It should have a capital and an American embassy.

+++++++++But the real problem runs deeper, in that Casey's non-committal reply suggests that he does not understand the nature of the Arab-Israeli conflict.++++++++

The nature depends on who you talk to.

+++++++++Recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital would, most importantly, send a signal to the Palestinians and their supporters about the depth, permanence, and resolve of U.S. support for Israel.+++++++++++

No, not the depth, permanence, and resolve of US support for Israel. No. It would be a case of simply supporting a country's right to have a capital. Any country would support that. Or should I say most countries. Or should I say most countries who care. Or should I say most countries who care and are not anti-Semitic.

John R.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Progressives admitted: Ahmad Shukeiri assured 'throwing Jews into sea' was literal [216 words]DaliaJun 18, 2021 08:17268409
1When Shukairy admitted his pre six-day war call throwing "the Jews into sea" [143 words]ElyJul 5, 2020 08:03259535
Totally agree, I live in Europe and it does not work otherwise [139 words]IgnacioJun 21, 2006 15:1748009
Capital [238 words]John RJun 17, 2006 13:0547834
A modest proposal [305 words]Jon - a brit in EurolandJun 16, 2006 09:4247762
You are wrong Harrak, Christians are victims in both cases but more victims with Muslims [49 words]AnwarJun 15, 2006 21:2847737
Casey should have and probably did know [100 words]Stuart M BliwasJun 15, 2006 19:4347734
Don't Hold Your Breath [50 words]BlackspeareJun 15, 2006 18:1047732
happy endings [180 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDJun 15, 2006 16:0247728
The threefold impact of Jerusalem [266 words]HarrakJun 14, 2006 21:1347690
You are wrong again [391 words]true believerJun 16, 2006 07:0147690
You argument has a hole..better cover it next time [375 words]HarrakJun 16, 2006 19:3947690
Your argument itself is a BIG hole [472 words]true believerJun 19, 2006 10:0747690
My argument has a big hole in which you fell! [198 words]HarrakJun 19, 2006 17:5547690
Your hole is getting bigger than your argument [385 words]true believerJun 21, 2006 05:1047690
entertainment value! [89 words]HarrakJun 25, 2006 13:2947690
Excellent entertainment! [77 words]AdmirerJun 26, 2006 02:3847690
re: entertainment value [228 words]true believerJun 26, 2006 07:2847690

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)