Muslim formula of success

Submitted by G.Bisvas (Germany), Aug 1, 2006 at 14:40

US obsession with bolshevism as the greatest danger to mankind and the rabid hatred of US towards Soviet Union has led to this situation today. Way back, the US should have (and could have) recognised that islam will be the worst-scenario danger for mankind - and not bolshevism or SU. The US and SU should have co-operated in exposing islam as an evil ideology. This historic chance was destroyed by the dollar-greed and petroleum-thirst of the US.

Now the islamic problem is intractable. Death-hungry irrational paradise-seeking shia as opponents, a new found shia-sunni solidarity (at least as far as hate for Israel and US goes), pleasure-seeking lazy careless western attitudes - all that will soon provide for the armageddon in west asia.

Islamists openly and proudly declare that they love death, that they teach their children to love death. The muslim proletariat is ready to kill and die for their muslim religious bosses (who live lives of great comfort, enjoyment and obscenity). What do non-muslims have to set against that? Muslims are producing far more children and they are teaching their children to love death and hate and destroy the non-muslims as a proof of their "love" for the "one and only allah". Can the non-muslims beat this formula? Among muslims the life of an individual poor-class muslim acquires any worth only if he acts as a bringer of death and terror to the non-muslims (even many muslims get classified as non-muslims if they do not support this politics of violence and terror against non-muslims).

Islamic fascism and imperialism is a class by itself - nazism, bolshevism, maoism were all not so evil and dangerous as islam is....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".