Who is the real enemy?

Submitted by Homefront (Australia), Oct 5, 2006 at 09:08

Media bias indeed. I would take this argument one step further. When Islamists make up a majority of muslims in our nations and practically holler their hatred at us. When they burn our cars, rob our homes and rape our women all under the banner of the crescent justified by the doctrine of the Prophet (peace be upon him). The thin veneer of Taqiyya is not enough to lay a smokescreen across such behaviour. I would say that in order to keep this quiet the west would have to be in the grip of a full scale Neomarxist plot complete with a smattering of Orwellian absurdity. Is it that the left believe the path to peace is to ignore that we are at war? Or is it that like some doomsday David Koresh style cult they believe we are all too wicked to survive. Certainly that great prophet of the left George Sorel believed as much.

When George W Bush proposed that they bomb Al Jazeera TV given it was a very important piece of enemy infrastructure Tony Blair dismissed the suggestion though I myself thought it as valid a target as Zakarwi himself. Perhaps on the same basis he should have considered setting aside a few bombs for CNN and the Michael Moores of the world.

More dangerous than the next world epidemic are the diseases of thought floating around bred by the banality of those hipster doofi nimrods in the 1960s. They severed our links with the past - destroyed our society without analysing or appreciating what it was they were destroying. The baby went with the bathwater. Now we have no future. Charged with the promulgation and perpetuation of the continual mind rape the John Pilger's, Michael Moores and Chomsky's of this world have kept the glorious west ending path of entropy alive. They are the generals and the journalists of our liberally biased press are the congregation of souless whores that make up the army. Even if Islam were to disintegrate tomorrow they would find a new enemy to sell us out to.

Homefront.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".