69 million page views

Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism not arabs

Reader comment on item: Polls, Palestinians and the Path to Peace

Submitted by Aslele Zaabi (Netherlands), Feb 19, 2003 at 02:14

In order to make this clear, we must examine the roots of Antisemitism. This term is generally understood as meaning "anti Jewish," but its basic meaning is a "hatred of Semitic peoples". The Semitic peoples are basically made up of Arabs, Jews and a few other Middle Eastern ethnic groups. There is a great similarity between the languages and cultures of the Semites; for example, Arabic and Hebrew are much alike.

The second largest linguistic and racial group in the world is the Indo-European community of nations. Most of the countries of present day Europe have Indo-European roots.


The pagan war god Wotan, one of the symbols of pagan barbarism and bigotry.

All these various civilizations have had their prophets who proclaimed the existence and the unity of God and made His commands known. But when we examine recorded history, we see that Indo-European peoples from ancient times always believed in paganism. The Greek and Roman civilizations, the Teutons, Vikings and other Barbarian peoples living in southern Europe at that time were all polytheistic pagans. For this reason, these communities remained completely without moral guidance. Violence and savagery were regarded as praiseworthy; homosexuality and adultery were widely practiced. (The most important historical representative of Indo-European civilization was the Roman Empire, and we must not forget that it was a savage society that delighted in seeing people torn apart in the arenas.)

These peoples who ruled Europe encountered monotheism through Jesus Christ, a prophet sent to Semitic people. Sent as a prophet to the children of Israel, the teaching of Jesus spread throughout Europe in the course of time and all the formerly pagan peoples gradually accepted Christianity.

But in the 18th and 19th centuries, with the weakening of Christianity and the growth of ideologies and philosophies that promoted the rejection of religion, a strange current of thought circulated in Europe: Neo-Paganism. The leaders of this movement claimed that European societies must reject Christianity and return to ancient pagan beliefs. According to the adherents of Neo-Paganism, the way European societies understood morality in ancient pagan times (i.e., a warlike, pitiless, bloodthirsty, unbounded barbarous morality), was much superior to the morality they adopted when they accepted Christianity (i.e., a humble, compassionate, peace-loving and religious morality).


Nietzsche was an antisemite, because he sympathized with the pagan culture of violence and hated Theistic religions.
One of the most important representatives of this trend is also one of the greatest theorists of Fascism: Friedrich Nietzsche. He hated Christianity; he believed that it had destroyed the warlike spirit of the German people, that is, it's very essence.

The adherents of Neo-Paganism were hostile to Christianity; at the same time, they adopted a great hatred for Judaism which they saw as the source of Christianity. Indeed, they saw Christianity as the disseminator of Jewish ideas throughout the world and regarded it as a kind of Jewish plot.

So, this Neo-Paganism, on the one hand incited hostility against religion and, on the other, gave birth to fascism and antisemitism. Especially when we look at the foundations of the Nazi ideology, we can see clearly that Hitler and his confreres were, in fact, pagans.

So the accusation that we as arabs are anti-semitic doesn't make sense..

Dislike (4)
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (77) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Path to Peace [32 words]steven seymourSep 20, 2005 21:1826103
1Australasia anti-Jewish, anti-American [482 words]TimDec 26, 2003 15:1612936
Is there a web site whose goal is peace and open to all. [38 words]Victor J. Diamond DDS, MS.Aug 26, 2003 01:3310765
Settlements [189 words]Peter FloranceJun 9, 2003 06:149421
Right On [60 words]Douglas Sprung MDApr 5, 2003 18:438075
What about the converse? [67 words]Gordon HowardApr 3, 2003 15:518003
Response to Debra [251 words]JlboothMar 14, 2003 00:257229
Misreading the Media [263 words]JulianMar 11, 2003 23:437198
They should come to peace [25 words]Bob BarkerMar 11, 2003 15:367193
Validity of poll "margin of error" number [125 words]Maurice ShurmanMar 10, 2003 22:097181
Arab Israel Conflict [92 words]David RonisMar 10, 2003 19:587176
Palestinians get too much support [217 words]Yeung Wai LungMar 9, 2003 10:557149
Comments on Polls, Palestinians..... [886 words]A fellow human beingMar 8, 2003 13:387139
Peace to Come? [34 words]Steven SeymourMar 4, 2003 10:147046
comment on peter florance's comment 2-18-03 [94 words]ralph cohenMar 1, 2003 22:196999
Yes, but... [194 words]HalFeb 26, 2003 20:456943
Palestinian Propaganda is being exported worldwide [312 words]David SteinbergFeb 26, 2003 20:246942
1964 [67 words]izodFeb 25, 2003 15:106903
Kudos [39 words]Dalia LauerFeb 25, 2003 05:446889
Irreconcilable differences [50 words]James SofkoFeb 23, 2003 19:386850
Their rhetoric is So Passe [56 words]MarkFeb 22, 2003 15:016843
Jerusalem's status [56 words]Peter KauffnerFeb 21, 2003 23:196832
the issue that is not raised enough. [215 words]David EckhausFeb 21, 2003 20:506830
Recognition of Israel [208 words]A.AFeb 21, 2003 11:216818
Destruction of Israel and Finally the West [142 words]robert s. catanFeb 21, 2003 10:096815
An oasis [51 words]Colin spencerFeb 21, 2003 09:416814
The Hoax That Is Palestine [329 words]Barry GreenspanFeb 21, 2003 01:436813
Excellent analysis! [178 words]EileenFeb 20, 2003 20:446807
the truth hurts [126 words]Rory WardFeb 20, 2003 12:166804
Unabashed Support for Israel Vital to Winning War [290 words]John BorgmanFeb 20, 2003 12:116803
Recognizing the inherent humanity of Palestinians [418 words]JeffFeb 20, 2003 01:376792
Reply to Freidoon (2/18/03) : I disagree... [76 words]JorgeFeb 19, 2003 23:326790
Agreement [45 words]MelvinFeb 19, 2003 19:116785
U.S. Interests [119 words]Rick KralFeb 19, 2003 17:246784
My thoughts [213 words]H. GamlienFeb 19, 2003 17:136783
Agree in part [87 words]DawinderFeb 19, 2003 17:006781
Peace is hopeless until Palestinian Leadership Changes [298 words]David MinkinFeb 19, 2003 05:356766
open letter to the middle east [700 words]george orwellJul 28, 2006 18:166766
7Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism not arabs [537 words]Aslele ZaabiFeb 19, 2003 02:146763
2Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism? NOT! [915 words]adam.Dec 19, 2006 05:316763
what a crock [35 words]AndrewNov 19, 2012 09:546763
NOBODY COULD SAY IT BETTER [33 words]Judith AntonelliFeb 18, 2003 23:366761
Middle East Peace [10 words]RobertFeb 18, 2003 23:146760
Should tell more about poll design [107 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bruce MyersFeb 18, 2003 21:416756
Anti-Semitism and Racism is the root of rejectionism [87 words]FreidoonFeb 18, 2003 20:466755
What prevents recognition of Israel NOW on its 1967 borders [102 words]hari iyerFeb 18, 2003 20:336754
Short Path to Peace is Terribly Long [137 words]Marvin DiamondFeb 18, 2003 17:316752
Palestinians & the Path to Peace [12 words]Bob RiesmanFeb 18, 2003 16:596750
Can there be Jewish citizens in a "Palestinian" country? [212 words]Norman WandFeb 18, 2003 16:176749
What "Palestinians?" [198 words]yonasonFeb 18, 2003 15:496747
Genocide by any other name [170 words]Dane GundersonFeb 18, 2003 15:246745
Peace and terrorism [355 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 18, 2003 15:136743
Response [221 words]Michael PFeb 18, 2003 15:126742
Half the battle is to define the problem [133 words]Ivan BarnaFeb 18, 2003 14:516740
Clear and cogent analysis [39 words]Les JordanFeb 18, 2003 14:316738
"Moral problem of settlements?" [492 words]Dr. Ron PollandFeb 18, 2003 14:216737
Palestinian Anger [59 words]RubenFeb 18, 2003 14:106736
Bless you,Daniel Pipes ! [105 words]Victor TordjmanFeb 18, 2003 13:286733
Why ARE Palestinians So Angry At Israel? [368 words]Ralph WinstanleyFeb 18, 2003 13:236732
Generosity should be mutual. [229 words]Farzana Shahid.Feb 18, 2003 12:386730
Another Possibility [141 words]William L. FischelFeb 18, 2003 12:216728
response to Peter Florance: Water [57 words]Ron WeinerFeb 18, 2003 12:036727
1No Palistinian State [36 words]David CottunFeb 18, 2003 11:536726
I have the answer [145 words]Joseph I. CeasarFeb 18, 2003 11:186725
Forget the PALS [65 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 18, 2003 11:176724
Is the Press missing something? [147 words]A. Orley Swartzentruber, Ph.D.Feb 18, 2003 10:526722
Polls and Palestinians [81 words]Steven HessFeb 18, 2003 10:456721
Polls,Palestinians &the Path to Peace [73 words]GARY DAVISFeb 18, 2003 10:436720
Legal Assistant [71 words]Helen BienstockFeb 18, 2003 10:396719
Free and informed peoples [30 words]Chris RamkoFeb 18, 2003 10:376718
Polls Telling, PLO/Arafat's Own Words More Telling [380 words]WilliamFeb 18, 2003 10:166717
epiphany [29 words]D.SokolFeb 18, 2003 09:516716
I agree but... [68 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ralph CohenFeb 18, 2003 09:466715
I agree [190 words]DebraFeb 18, 2003 08:526713
Sincere recognition of Israel essential [57 words]Andreas H. AureFeb 18, 2003 07:486712
Settlements [194 words]Peter FloranceFeb 18, 2003 07:246711
No brainer [109 words]David WulfmanFeb 18, 2003 07:216710

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)