69 million page views

Comments on Polls, Palestinians.....

Reader comment on item: Polls, Palestinians and the Path to Peace

Submitted by A fellow human being (Sweden), Mar 8, 2003 at 13:38

As human beings not all muslims are terrorists or violent but the problem lies in the teachings of Koran. According to Koranic verses first thing a muslim has to come in agreement that he/she has total belief in what Koran says, there is no room for argument or flexibility. Those muslims prefer themselves to call as moderate or whatsoever, is either deception or simply they have abondoned Islam but afraid to declare so because of constant fear for life.This brief introduction is in regard of the article: Polls, Palestinians and the Path to Peace by Daniel Pipes, New York Post, February 18, 2003.

If some one is not born among the muslims, I think it is impossible for him/her to comprehend Islamic psychology. I am mentioning this because I am unaware of where Mr. Pipes is born or grown up. What I am almost sure that Mr.Pipes is not born in Israel where Mr.Pipes was surrouded by muslims. It can be heard and seen all the time in state run TV or Radio or in the news papers, books or sermons from the mosques the massive propaganda, not simply hatred but very often open call to exterminate Jews and other infidels from this earth. My experience is from Bangladesh, and I wonder if it is more or less same in almost all Islamic countries.

It is very often heard from all Islamic countries in defence of terrorism the phrase "The root cause". They always say this in indirect support of terrorism perpetrated by the muslims. What the muslims hide is that the root cause of Islamic terrorism is in the teaching of Koran itself where the Jews and other infidels are denied the right to exist, so simple it is. You can change the Palestinian leadership of Mr. Arafat hundreds of times, but the root cause would still be there. Mr. Arafat or anybody else simply do not have the right to act otherwise. This is the root cause, and be in no doubt about this.Without changing the Koranic teachings, there is no way to change what is happening around.

Probably to start with, the initial responsibility lies on the shoulder of the UN. Only this body (UN) can open a discussion regarding this philosophy which I consider "against almost all basic elements of the universal human rights", strange however that unconciously or conciously, this is accepted by all civilized nations. Well, still the problem will not be solved unless the Islamic countries themselves revert the teachings of Koran. To start with, it is only the "House of the Sauds" can initiate this process. But I doubt that very much because that house would ever even think to initiate that process. The house of Sauds is believed to finance about 65000 madrasas only in Bangladesh to equip millions of souls with the most dangerous destructive weapons the human race has ever came across, the arms of hatred.

Well, then what to do to preserve freedom and dignity of the whole human race? I do not have the answer. Looking forward to see some deep writing about this by Mr. Pipes.

I become confused when I see millions of the so called peace lovers around the world demonstrate against the possible war against Mr. Saddam (the gas master of the post WWII period). the purpose of that is not only to bring the whole gang to justice but also to give the Iraqi peoples a chance to breath for a moment as free human beings, the virtue of which these so called peace lovers are enjoying every moment in their lives. Not to mention here of those hundreds of thousands of murdered peoples and almost a quarter of the Iraqi people are living in exile in fear of their lives from this murderous regime.

I become confused to see when the holy peples shake hands and sow their support in the name of peace with the leading members of the regime who just the other day gassed to death thousands Kurds, simply because they were Kurdish muslims. It is aprehensible the violent opposition by the tyranic rulers of the Islamic countries of changing the murderous Iraqi regime because of obvious reasons, but I am confused when this is done by the so called leaders of the free world. These so called peace lovers never explain how a violent regime and perpetrator of one of the most gruesome crime against humanity can be changed by peaceful means. These peace lovers never explain why they actively participated to destroy the Milocevcs regime. It would be a shame for the whole humanity to let these cruel perpetrator of genocide on their own fellow citizens go free at this juncture of history.

The dangerous axis has surfaced in this period of human history from the dormancy that is the axis composed of the Nazis, the Communists and the Extreme Islamists. And the free world is in extreme need to unite to fight these evils the humanity facing today. I just only murmer myself that is, The Nurengberg trial is still relevat today, not only to try Mr. Saddam and associates for the genocide on the Kurds, but also those who equipped him with the means which had only one purpose, that was to exterminate some human races from this earth.

A fellow human being
Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (77) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Path to Peace [32 words]steven seymourSep 20, 2005 21:1826103
1Australasia anti-Jewish, anti-American [482 words]TimDec 26, 2003 15:1612936
Is there a web site whose goal is peace and open to all. [38 words]Victor J. Diamond DDS, MS.Aug 26, 2003 01:3310765
Settlements [189 words]Peter FloranceJun 9, 2003 06:149421
Right On [60 words]Douglas Sprung MDApr 5, 2003 18:438075
What about the converse? [67 words]Gordon HowardApr 3, 2003 15:518003
Response to Debra [251 words]JlboothMar 14, 2003 00:257229
Misreading the Media [263 words]JulianMar 11, 2003 23:437198
They should come to peace [25 words]Bob BarkerMar 11, 2003 15:367193
Validity of poll "margin of error" number [125 words]Maurice ShurmanMar 10, 2003 22:097181
Arab Israel Conflict [92 words]David RonisMar 10, 2003 19:587176
Palestinians get too much support [217 words]Yeung Wai LungMar 9, 2003 10:557149
Comments on Polls, Palestinians..... [886 words]A fellow human beingMar 8, 2003 13:387139
Peace to Come? [34 words]Steven SeymourMar 4, 2003 10:147046
comment on peter florance's comment 2-18-03 [94 words]ralph cohenMar 1, 2003 22:196999
Yes, but... [194 words]HalFeb 26, 2003 20:456943
Palestinian Propaganda is being exported worldwide [312 words]David SteinbergFeb 26, 2003 20:246942
1964 [67 words]izodFeb 25, 2003 15:106903
Kudos [39 words]Dalia LauerFeb 25, 2003 05:446889
Irreconcilable differences [50 words]James SofkoFeb 23, 2003 19:386850
Their rhetoric is So Passe [56 words]MarkFeb 22, 2003 15:016843
Jerusalem's status [56 words]Peter KauffnerFeb 21, 2003 23:196832
the issue that is not raised enough. [215 words]David EckhausFeb 21, 2003 20:506830
Recognition of Israel [208 words]A.AFeb 21, 2003 11:216818
Destruction of Israel and Finally the West [142 words]robert s. catanFeb 21, 2003 10:096815
An oasis [51 words]Colin spencerFeb 21, 2003 09:416814
The Hoax That Is Palestine [329 words]Barry GreenspanFeb 21, 2003 01:436813
Excellent analysis! [178 words]EileenFeb 20, 2003 20:446807
the truth hurts [126 words]Rory WardFeb 20, 2003 12:166804
Unabashed Support for Israel Vital to Winning War [290 words]John BorgmanFeb 20, 2003 12:116803
Recognizing the inherent humanity of Palestinians [418 words]JeffFeb 20, 2003 01:376792
Reply to Freidoon (2/18/03) : I disagree... [76 words]JorgeFeb 19, 2003 23:326790
Agreement [45 words]MelvinFeb 19, 2003 19:116785
U.S. Interests [119 words]Rick KralFeb 19, 2003 17:246784
My thoughts [213 words]H. GamlienFeb 19, 2003 17:136783
Agree in part [87 words]DawinderFeb 19, 2003 17:006781
Peace is hopeless until Palestinian Leadership Changes [298 words]David MinkinFeb 19, 2003 05:356766
open letter to the middle east [700 words]george orwellJul 28, 2006 18:166766
7Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism not arabs [537 words]Aslele ZaabiFeb 19, 2003 02:146763
2Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism? NOT! [915 words]adam.Dec 19, 2006 05:316763
what a crock [35 words]AndrewNov 19, 2012 09:546763
NOBODY COULD SAY IT BETTER [33 words]Judith AntonelliFeb 18, 2003 23:366761
Middle East Peace [10 words]RobertFeb 18, 2003 23:146760
Should tell more about poll design [107 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bruce MyersFeb 18, 2003 21:416756
Anti-Semitism and Racism is the root of rejectionism [87 words]FreidoonFeb 18, 2003 20:466755
What prevents recognition of Israel NOW on its 1967 borders [102 words]hari iyerFeb 18, 2003 20:336754
Short Path to Peace is Terribly Long [137 words]Marvin DiamondFeb 18, 2003 17:316752
Palestinians & the Path to Peace [12 words]Bob RiesmanFeb 18, 2003 16:596750
Can there be Jewish citizens in a "Palestinian" country? [212 words]Norman WandFeb 18, 2003 16:176749
What "Palestinians?" [198 words]yonasonFeb 18, 2003 15:496747
Genocide by any other name [170 words]Dane GundersonFeb 18, 2003 15:246745
Peace and terrorism [355 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 18, 2003 15:136743
Response [221 words]Michael PFeb 18, 2003 15:126742
Half the battle is to define the problem [133 words]Ivan BarnaFeb 18, 2003 14:516740
Clear and cogent analysis [39 words]Les JordanFeb 18, 2003 14:316738
"Moral problem of settlements?" [492 words]Dr. Ron PollandFeb 18, 2003 14:216737
Palestinian Anger [59 words]RubenFeb 18, 2003 14:106736
Bless you,Daniel Pipes ! [105 words]Victor TordjmanFeb 18, 2003 13:286733
Why ARE Palestinians So Angry At Israel? [368 words]Ralph WinstanleyFeb 18, 2003 13:236732
Generosity should be mutual. [229 words]Farzana Shahid.Feb 18, 2003 12:386730
Another Possibility [141 words]William L. FischelFeb 18, 2003 12:216728
response to Peter Florance: Water [57 words]Ron WeinerFeb 18, 2003 12:036727
1No Palistinian State [36 words]David CottunFeb 18, 2003 11:536726
I have the answer [145 words]Joseph I. CeasarFeb 18, 2003 11:186725
Forget the PALS [65 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 18, 2003 11:176724
Is the Press missing something? [147 words]A. Orley Swartzentruber, Ph.D.Feb 18, 2003 10:526722
Polls and Palestinians [81 words]Steven HessFeb 18, 2003 10:456721
Polls,Palestinians &the Path to Peace [73 words]GARY DAVISFeb 18, 2003 10:436720
Legal Assistant [71 words]Helen BienstockFeb 18, 2003 10:396719
Free and informed peoples [30 words]Chris RamkoFeb 18, 2003 10:376718
Polls Telling, PLO/Arafat's Own Words More Telling [380 words]WilliamFeb 18, 2003 10:166717
epiphany [29 words]D.SokolFeb 18, 2003 09:516716
I agree but... [68 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ralph CohenFeb 18, 2003 09:466715
I agree [190 words]DebraFeb 18, 2003 08:526713
Sincere recognition of Israel essential [57 words]Andreas H. AureFeb 18, 2003 07:486712
Settlements [194 words]Peter FloranceFeb 18, 2003 07:246711
No brainer [109 words]David WulfmanFeb 18, 2003 07:216710

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)