relevance? again!

Submitted by bos (United Kingdom), Jan 17, 2008 at 07:46

the problem with Janusz isn't his simplistic passage on comparative religion, it isn't your obtuse perception regarding comparative modern religious judiciary's and their roots; its the fact that you seem to think that any similarities, accurate or otherwise, would somehow be relevant to the article or the issue it raises.

it is unnaceptable to continuously chant 'jews and christians have been naughty too! and sometimes still are!', as a response to every opinion or commentary that doesnt favour your worldview regarding a contempary issue that involves a muslim, a muslim practice, perception, doctrine, greivance etc.

its 'not' the economy, its not the Yahud, its the integrity!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".