Our dear Ayaz and poor tablighee logic

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Mar 24, 2008 at 18:48

Our dear Ayaz should get his money back from his glorious madrassa, and what did we learn from his post? Nothing not a thing and he does not even get it and he wrote this little gem

>The previous books have been corrupted but it does not mean all of it,

Really? Then how do you know which part is corrupted and which part is not corrupted? And even if you get the part that was not corrupted how do you know that this Muahmmad is indeed Muhammad the caravan raider and Arabian warlord? And like I said my name is Muhammad and Allah spoke to me via an angel and I have a book for you. Do you think that I might be that Muhammad in these holy books? What do you think our dear Ayaz?

> and i am just quoting some references from your very scriptures relevant to the topic.

What topic? that you are a wannabe Arab? or that you are a tablighee? or that your poor command of logic is poor? or that your education is poor?

IF you did not get what I wrote which you do not seem to get, then I would regard you to be beyond help:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".