Why does mass media support [Mo]barak Hussein Obama?

Submitted by RF (United States), Feb 12, 2008 at 20:38

Islamic Rulers have invested large amount of petrodollars in US mass media industries, as example AOL is largely owned by Saudi Arabia (that's why I no longer use AOL) . They simply assert their financial power and influence and filter the information that could be damaging to their pet prez Mr. Mobarak Hussein Obama.

Two centuries ago we gained our independence from British Empire and ouster British Governor from Williamsburg. Now, many of us are exited of having a crony of Islamic Dictators as the president.

What has happened to this country?

The mass media, controlled largely by Islamic Dictators investment, will NOT say anything that could endanger their greatest chance of putting on of their own as US Prez.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".