I suppose

Submitted by B. Williame (Belgium), Apr 23, 2008 at 03:23

I suppose I already anwsered partially in my previous reaction to this one.

I'll start to with quoting you.

"Williame,

you are telling me that the preparation by the muslims of 30,000 soldiers and the money spent on preparing them and that it took the prophet to gather those men long time who left their beloved ones behind in famine and they left their crops to rot for nothing??? - and that all the caravans were giving mohammad false stories??, we can say one person , two person may lie to the prophets but not all, whom some of them are trustworthy."

Where is it written All(how many are those, 2? , 3?) caravans where bringing Mohammed message of an invasion army? And yes they had to state there was 1, Else the 'expedition' he had started would have been cause for the loss of many Muslim faith in him. So it's not really proven there was a roman army, but what seems more then obvious is that The army and all there families MUST believe there was one. If they didn't the results would have been terrible for the empire Mohammed(PBUH) created back then.

"Come on, there is no smoke without fire.- I believe Mohammad and specially when he said "I was victorious by fear""

Yes I do think you believe our prophet. Why shoudn't you? I would probably believe him also, if I'd met him. (this isn't meant Ironically) But as this is impossible and none of what is written on Muslim side was written by Him(PBUH). I could still question it's correctness, why haven't you?

regards

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".