69 million page views

drivers license

Reader comment on item: Living Freely in England a Century Ago

Submitted by myth (Germany), Jul 31, 2011 at 07:46

Two decades ago drivers licenses were different in Germany. I still have one of those. Paper and fabric is what I hold in my hand when I take a look at it. I look into my face the way it was 25 years ago. The drivers license has aged with me. The fabric and the paper aged, my picture did not. The state does not ask for a renewal. The four-digit postcodes I read remind me of cold-war West-Germany. Today's postcodes have one digit reunified into the number.

I recall when I drove with my grandfather and the police stopped us. They tried but could not read his drivers license. It was valid, issued by the Wehrmacht in 1940, handwritten with a photograph of my grandfather when he was young. The police knew: if we cannot identify the man on the picture, cannot read the writing, cannot find similarity to another known document then yes, the license is authentic. The police procedure was a friendly handshake between present and the past.

Authenticity of the document no longer counts. The driver, no longer the document is in the focus of state attention. The state now tracks people moving, driving, even aging on their drivers license. A plastic card, a chip between some layers of plastic, a brandnew photo make this happen. A new license would require renewal after som years.

Looking at my license again I know: East Germany 25 years would have loved the new plastic drivers licenses. I remember those days, my licenses makes me remember. I recognize the police state in today's technology.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
really? [42 words]mikeAug 28, 2011 11:05188920
1What is the point ...? [265 words]Amin RiazAug 3, 2011 21:18188002
Good Question - What is the Point [401 words]M. ToveyAug 9, 2011 15:46188002
A.J.P. Taylor is no longer reading comments on his work [31 words]PaulAug 22, 2011 20:52188002
Confused [8 words]Amin RiazAug 23, 2011 22:46188002
... India? [63 words]SamAug 3, 2011 05:09187979
1drivers license [265 words]mythJul 31, 2011 07:46187880
1Signs of the Times ? [239 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jules PostenJul 28, 2011 09:58187794
Response to Muslim Laws and Rules Sign Postings [238 words]Jules PostenJul 29, 2011 04:32187794
2Hello America: London Sends Its Regards [726 words]M. ToveyAug 1, 2011 12:11187794
Sad how hatred can cultivate intolerance and ignorance [217 words]AnonymousAug 5, 2011 05:40187794
Jihad is not over, not let race onercome war for humanity [1261 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat PanthiAug 14, 2011 21:57187794
Humanity Will Fail If It Fails to Love [848 words]M. ToveyAug 16, 2011 12:07187794
Distinctions of English Gentry and the Common British Agrarian [358 words]M. ToveyJul 25, 2011 11:51187687
america [110 words]concernedJul 26, 2011 08:58187687
3The cost of empire [68 words]RichardJul 21, 2011 09:50187599
2the other side of the coin [140 words]concernedJul 21, 2011 03:52187594
women and politics [55 words]rick oneilJul 23, 2011 17:59187594

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)