Jihad is not over, not let race onercome war for humanity

Submitted by Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat Panthi (India), Aug 14, 2011 at 21:57

To Dear American and British (White, Black, Christian and Jews) friends,

through Daniel Pipes.

I am a Bhartiye (an Indian), 100%, born and living in India.

With my prejudice mind, I should be saying, 'White are paying for sins of their ancestors'.
But I strongly say Whites have got first right over Britain, any problem between Irish or English, labour or conservative is their own problem, I have no business to poke my nose, unless there is gross violation of human rights or gross injustice, yes in that case as citizen of the planet I may intervene.
But, it is not so, British are capable of handling their own affairs, and I should concentrate on my problems.

To some extend its true, Britishers Colonized India and in the process atrocities were committed. But that should not be impediment in our present relations, nor it justifies illegal migration from India or anywhere.
Some British officer somewhere tortured one Indian say in 1924, now Indians can bully English teenager in London!

I strongly condemn violence against citizens with British ancestry or legal migrants.

Illegal migrant should not be there anyway, so violence against them or no violence against them is irrelevant issue.

British friends, please don't take is otherwise, nor do you need my advice, but I am sharing my thought with you.

After collapse of Raj, British naturally migrated, there were Indians who stood by the government of that time i.e. British Raj, all of a sudden became untrustworthy, treacherous, creatures worth condemnation and prosecution. All those who were opposing British, or arrested by British for reason what so ever became Nationalist Hero overnight!

As an Indian I support the cause quit India by Indians at time. Why should there be British or outside Raj in India, I support Tilak 'Freedom is my birthright'. But things were not as simple as they seem, all of those opposing British were not Nationalists or Patriots. Nor all not opposing British were dishonest or anti-Indian.

Anyhow anyone who saved British family or was simply working as employee was at risk of being labelled hazardous element.

Now as their moral duty, promises, assurance for those who stood with British, it was necessary to protect or accommodate them in new world order.

I still say all those who supported British Raj were not anti- Indian, Indians, but they looked at things from different angle.

Some Patriotic Indians Preferred British because there sudden exodus may collapse India, or there can be power vacuum and worst power will be captured by those who don't deserve it; and unfortunately it happened so.

Who rules India, how its ruled was no more British problem or issue, British were facing new reality and challenges, abandon extra luggage of glorious past that seemed liability in reality, though served as emotional food for particular section and generation.

India was taken over by Jihadis, Partitioned exactly on this date 14Aug 64 years back. One part was Muslim India that is now Pakistan and Bangladesh and other was Universal India. So Jihadis took one part exclusively for Muslims and in other Muslims were equal Partners. This happened in connivance of first generation Muslim, Infact who was not Muslim but wanted to prove more Muslim tan any real Muslim, and sold dream of Pakistan, one other hand there was one Dhimmi, Mohan Dass who projected himself as Hindu or Secular Hindu, and in grab of Hinduism/liberal Hinduism allowed Muslims to be equal Partners in the Non-Muslim Part what is now called India. While all this was happening British were indifferent, not realizing power to Jihadis, a fuul Nation to Jihadis will be schools of 'Doctrine of destruction' the situation that you are escaping, will not let you escape and will catch you napping in your own country, in your own home, the indifference of British and convince of Mohan with Jihadis is the blunder, for that British are paying, Indians are paying the whole humanity is paying.

Pakistan has become factory of Jihad, naturally as its very foundation was on 'Two Nation Theory' named by Jihadis. Jihadis claimed that India is one country in that we share but there are Two Nations Muslims and Hindus/non-Muslims; in fact it is 'one Planet that Humans and Jihadis share but there are Two Different Worlds.

While realizing the importance of protection and migration for their ex-loyal subjects, British did not realize elementary difference between Hindu/Sikh loyal and Jihadi loyal. All the vows at the time of migration were just tool to get into Britain to accomplish the Jihad and work for real force he is loyal to. While signing the pledges with grim expression, Jihadi is laughing at stupid piece of paper and undeveloped mind of its author, he knows is already faithfully married his Jihad ideology, that runs through his blood.

If the Reality is British need Migrants then be sure who you are allowing, try to distinguish between migrants. To have a dream of better life for migrant is not only natural for migrant but vital for hosts. British please learn to distinguish and discriminate. I mentioned above some British action somewhere during Raj can not justify bullying of White now, Indians don't bully anyone, Pak-Jihadi always does, please differentiate between two, its good for you and good for us.

But be sure other than financial dream does migrant carry any other agenda!

Not allowing or trusting anyone is not going to help, trusting anyone is suicidal.

Now this unfortunate event of rioting may be a deliberate attempt or prove to be reason for getting your concentration away from real enemy called Jihad.

Basic difference if Black (Christian) teen is rioting he misguided, if Jihadi is rioting he is guided by his book, elders, and clergy.

As three armed men, who were on street challenging anyone and everyone, so called looters and law and order agencies?

Being sure because of the terror of their background no dhimmi will dare them, but a group challenged and in the process overconfident threesome got killed. Now as usual jihadi propaganda machine and political correctness theory took the central stage and three armed men were made martyrs and challenger as criminals.

It is propagated Muslim migrants are not Jihadis, atl least no more now , rather they were never a liability, law abuser, spitting at dead bodies of English soldiers, love Jihadis, but as law abiding protective citizens and only hope for Britain against everyone.

Since Sikhs are brave so Jihadis should be accommodated by Sikhs and English alike, and black Christian should value them as victim cousin.

Whole world and specially England is at risk because of few black or Caribbean rowdy teens.

This incident is being used to lessen the crimes of Jihadis which are spread over every continent and inch of this planet and for1400 years.

It is projected that these unemployed teenagers are more dangerous than Laden, so Britishers stop worrying, Rapist Holy man, Laden, Pakistan, Afghans, Somalis or bombing, public stoning, Sharia, rape, loot, love jihad and Jihad itself.

Now since so many shoes/clothes/electric gadgets being looted so accept Jihadis as brothers, accept their demands, get your towers blown, girls rapped, faith overrun values thrown out and in return they will protect you from few dozen teenagers who roam with sticks.

Conclusion: These riots were bad, as any riots are. But it was not a massacre and genocide that is just round the corner. Don't let these riots be used as forgetting basis for carnages of Jihadis and stop the process of uniting human race against Jihadis

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".