Mosques in Vetican; Another hypocrisy from Slayhy

Submitted by Josh (United States), Nov 11, 2011 at 23:28

Dear Readers: Here they go again. The Islamic apologists do not care if they are making sense. When someone objects to the fact that many Saudi Arabia does not allow churches to be built, Slayhy questions if a Mosque can be bult in Vetican. Anyone with honesty and intelligence will acknowledge that there is no equivalence between Vetican and Saudi Arabia. The former is a small religious enclave inside a city in a country where non-catholics do not need to go if they don't desire and the latter is a vast nation where people of hundreds of nationality must visit for work and pleasure.

Arguments like Slayhy's are neither dumb nor ignorant; they are just pure hypocritical containing no respect for other people's intelligence.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".