so skilful

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Dec 5, 2011 at 04:47

Mr Slayhy - who has to believe every thing he reads about the 3rd hand descriptions of Mohammeds alleged 'miracles' , writes -

"Muhammad during his time had many miracles - the least is when he had a battle with the Quraysh near Badr, they were 300 Muslims among them one horsman and premitive weapons, the Infidels were 1000 and 70 horsemen and larger amount and more sufisticated weaponery."

But Mr Slayhy left out the many miracles of the Missing Witnesses.

Two of the most notable miracles of the Missing Witnesses - were the complete absence of witnesses to Mo's splitting of the Moon with his little finger. What bigger miracle can there be than the tens of thousands of skilful and learned Chinese and Hindu astronomers were made to completely forget that they had seen the Moon split in two by Mohammed - and never once mention it in their writings and reports? So skilful was the person who wrought this miracle that he also remembered to include Slavic, Siberian, Finnic, Germanic and Celtic shamans and sky-watchers and townsfolk in the Great Unrememberance.

In fact so thorough was Mohammed that he also included Australian Aboriginals, South American Indians, Pacific Islanders, Japanese and Eskimos. Not one of the millions alive noticed - or if they did - they all forgot to write it down or tell others about it.

The other major Miracle of the Missing witnesses involved the people of Jerusalem and Mohammed's flying visit late one night on the back of al Burak. Even though that involved far fewer people - not one bothered to record or relate this fantastic event.

As most of them were Jews - not recording this event it must be one of the earliest examples of Zionist conspiracies against Islam..

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".