Got Cha! Answer for Dhimmi ...

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Dec 22, 2011 at 19:46

ASNWER ME THIS THIS - DHIMMI HAS LONG LONG LIST ... AND PETER IS BUILDING HIS ACCOUNT UP.

SO HOW DO YOU ANSWER FOR THESE LIES? DON'T FAFF ABOUT - I WANT ANSWERS TO WHAT I ASKED FOR. SEE IF YOU CAN MANGE IT.

Not one muslim on this blog has yet been able to logically and rationally answer Dhimmi's well-presented Arabic language demonstrations of the clear inconsistencies in the 'perfect' koran. When they can't win the standard 'tactic' is to resort to name calling - or suggesting there is something wrong with the critic.

Do you call petty personal insults reams of them repeated with each posts .... as logical and rational?

He he he - ha ha ha got you!

I have DEFEATED Dhimmi - countless times. I have DEMONSTRATED how ...

For example he has repeatedly lied that 2 Arabic dictionaries .... Hans Wehr on Page 426 Al Mawrid on page 99 - the word Istilaam means receipt.

http://kalamullah.com/Books/Hans-Wehr.pdf

So why such an easy lie? Have you got an answer ... as you hold him in high regard? Answer this?

You can check - both dictionaries are available at - kalamullah.com

Now - have you got anything to say to that? Why not try to answer?

He has repeatedly lied over such simple thing as word in a dictionary.

His most recent was finding alternatives for 3 words - then lying that I had made others up just because he found different words?

Yet they are in the dictionary and I had shown them WITH CURRENT USAGE!

-----------------

He accused the Quran for getting this one rule WRONG - yet he repeatedly got the rule wrong. I CORRECTED HIM. I ... ME! He did not even know the name of this rule. To this day he repeats it wrong.

Then he pasted a link of a Children's School Grammar book - but because he COULD NOT read it. He got stuff from there OUTRIGHT wrong.

Did he have an answer no.

He does not EVEN know basics of Arabic grammar. He himself laughed at the notions that Verbs Conjugate..... ha ha ha. Imagine that. Blimey!

---------

Anyone who is going to present criticism of literature it is expected they ADAVNCED skills. Yet he laughed at "Syntactical Analysis" also known as (Parsing)

He does not even know the difference between Verb Its Object and Subject.

------------

Arabs have a separate subject area where they discuss Arabic Grammar. Yet he does not even know this. And laughed at me - for even mentioning it. He called it bogus.... it is expected that he knew this.

-------------

I repeatedly asked him to present expert opinion form Western Scholars .... He could not EVEN bring one name..... to this day.

Names he likes to repeat in other instances ... like Wansbrough were against the view that there are grammar mistakes in the Quran.

-------------

He went as far as to say.... all Arabs are not aware of their . And the works of Arabic grammarians is false. So by which stands is he judging Quran from?

Sorry ... its is their language..... if they do not know its grammar and rules who does?

------------

He has yet to say where and with whom has he learned Arabic. Which he only pretends to know.

--------

So where does he get his stuff from - well its all from anti-Islam sites like - answering-islam.

All arguments were from there - rest he made up. I answered his every single LIE over one issue.

I answered him with OVER 300 comments - and he left it there. ...

-------

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".