|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The November 2012 electionReader comment on item: Romney vs. Obama vis-à-vis Israel Submitted by Lujack Skylark (United States), Sep 4, 2012 at 23:23 Romney vs. Obama. (1) Romney as United States president would back Israel against Syria and Iran. (2) Obama re-elected means Israel must fight these nations all alone. (3) PM Benjamin Netanyahu would be in a win win situation if he bombed Iran's nuclear sites before the November election for (4) Romney has already stated Iran would not get the bomb-Romney would not condemn an Israeli attack (5) Obama would be placed in an awkward position since he promised USA enemies like Russia and the Palestinians things would change dramatically once he is reelected. Obama might have to commit US forces against Iran should Netanyahu strike before November. Once Obama is reelected he will do nothing to support Israel. Before the election Obama might be forced to betray his friends. (6) Netanyahu's choice towards Iran is quite important in exposing Obama's true character before the elections for (7) afterwards Netanyahu has lost his chance for the USA forces in the Persian Gulf to be his ally.
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (47) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |