69 million page views

This should not happen in the West

Reader comment on item: Excluding Jews and Others from Law Courts

Submitted by Amit Srivastava (India), Mar 12, 2013 at 22:18

While the US cannot and should not impose its laws and its institutions on others, the fact is that it should strongly protect its laws and institutions inside its boundaries. The US is powerful because of its Constitution and also because of its institutions. The world would always require powerful US.

The defendants have no right, whether in the US or in the UK or elsewhere in the West, to tell their courts who can be or cannot be the members of jury in their cases.

The fact is that powerful countries like the US should look for more homogeneity and not less. While individuals of different faiths and cultures should be free to practice their religions and follow their cultures, the immigrants and immigrant-nationals have the duty to respect American Constitution and also respect its institutions.

The fact is that the US requires increased affinity and union among the Whites. It requires slight dominance of the Republican with a condition that they do not move beyond 5% Right of the Center. The US requires cultural revivalism without majority discriminating against the minorities.

The US should not import diffusiveness from the Rest nor should it induce what should be called as the second stage of illiteracy in the Rest. Economic interests could be served by other means as well. But sure, the US should dictate prices and should provide capital of all sorts in all possible currencies. It could ensure increased homogeneity in the world.

The US courts should never accept the conditions on juries. All probable are possible.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (53) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2In France, it happened and it was legal [99 words]Chemla VéroniqueApr 16, 2013 14:18205227
France is worse: hypocritical too - the same country that venerates Jerry Lewis [9 words]/alanaJul 5, 2013 21:47205227
Muslims' machine [40 words]BenMar 23, 2013 17:22204647
10British court system: American revolution far from the end [43 words]Michael KerjmanMar 23, 2013 12:13204629
Discrimination [21 words]johnhenrikMar 21, 2013 10:10204549
Nothing new here [143 words]Rick LevineMar 19, 2013 18:14204493
Exclusion of Jews from Juries [70 words]Josephine BaconMar 18, 2013 03:58204440
Exclusion of Jews from case in British court [81 words]argus4Apr 21, 2013 19:04204440
Maccaba vs. Lichtenstein [233 words]Josephine BaconApr 22, 2013 03:04204440
Turkey, Fiddler Style [50 words]AlanaJul 4, 2013 22:25204440
Turkey, Fiddler style [25 words]Talking TurkeyJul 5, 2013 02:43204440
6What is next? [33 words]Michael Hanni MorcosMar 14, 2013 15:15204327
2It may backfire [74 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Kepha HorMar 13, 2013 20:57204302
Judge rejected defense lawyer's request as unconstitutional [1 words]Eben SpinonzaMar 13, 2013 19:55204301
3Is it all stealth jihad [36 words]NuritGMar 13, 2013 17:06204290
3Muslim first, citizen second - the Islamist agenda [162 words]mythMar 14, 2013 04:37204290
1My comment was not antagonizing and thus damages our defense. [59 words]NuritGMar 14, 2013 17:46204290
3Chasing green ambulances [170 words]RichardMar 13, 2013 14:13204289
only testimonies concerning the case - the free choice of religion [251 words]mythMar 13, 2013 05:51204276
prejudice concerning the defendant [218 words]mythMar 13, 2013 05:20204274
2Antisemitism has gone mainstream in the United States [50 words]NuritGMar 13, 2013 01:34204272
1Aaaaugh [25 words]Kepha HorMar 13, 2013 21:00204272
antisemitism mainstream in United T] [74 words]AlanaJul 5, 2013 21:43204272
Frederick Cohn is correct [78 words]EAMar 12, 2013 23:55204271
No, Judge Vitaliano is correct. [99 words]JeffMar 14, 2013 12:48204271
2not necessarily [68 words]ESMMar 12, 2013 22:50204268
1So right [58 words]saraMar 13, 2013 18:35204268
Truly ironic [75 words]stanley bMar 13, 2013 18:39204268
American Jury Selection [111 words]ThestevenMar 12, 2013 22:35204267
This should not happen in the West [259 words]Amit SrivastavaMar 12, 2013 22:18204266
4Imagine if a Muslim was barred from a jury [8 words]Gamaliel IsaacMar 12, 2013 21:36204264
2A slippery slope [130 words]MikeKuMar 14, 2013 11:05204264
5Will they now exclude… [26 words]Kevin from OttawaMar 12, 2013 21:13204263
3Jury of his peers? [29 words]David SabghirMar 12, 2013 19:49204261
5Putting biases aside [22 words]brtzgMar 12, 2013 19:44204260
1Excluding Jews. Here we go again... [57 words]Steven LMar 12, 2013 19:29204259
2Exclusing Jews and Others from Juries [154 words]JudithMar 12, 2013 19:25204258
1Traitors! [37 words]AdamMar 12, 2013 19:09204257
4Jewish lawyers [65 words]Susan KMar 12, 2013 19:03204256
Not every Jewish lawyer is good [33 words]RonMar 13, 2013 13:55204256
Not accurate [99 words]saraMar 13, 2013 18:46204256
Fees [112 words]Susan KMar 13, 2013 19:10204256
Generalizing [53 words]saraMar 13, 2013 19:15204256
Let's not extrapolate [134 words]Susan KMar 13, 2013 19:31204256
Another generalization [215 words]saraMar 14, 2013 18:09204256
WHATEVER [152 words]Susan KMar 14, 2013 18:12204256
YES [52 words]Susan KMar 14, 2013 19:27204256
3Why not excluding Jews from their acts of violence? [18 words]LaurentMar 12, 2013 18:56204254
3Excluding Jews & others from juries [56 words]Henry MarcotMar 12, 2013 18:12204253
You've stolen the words from my mouth :-) [74 words]DmitryMar 12, 2013 23:03204253
next time [8 words]NECMar 12, 2013 15:19204249
2It is sick and racist to exclude someone due to religion, colour or race ... but . . . . [151 words]Phil GreendMar 12, 2013 14:45204245
1The propensity of Islamists defendants to hire Jewish lawyers [27 words]Michael Francis KielyMar 12, 2013 14:16204242

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)