69 million page views

Inshallah

Reader comment on item: [The Abu Ali Case and] Balancing Liberties, Security

Submitted by Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim (United States), Mar 4, 2005 at 06:55

Inshallah
The Arabic word Inshallah literally "if God let be" has been a very popular word in all Islamic cultures, whether Arabic or not, since the emergence of Islam. It has even gained an international status and is known almost everywhere alongside popular words like computer, although sometimes with a smile of irony. This expression is a contraction of three Arabic words. The constituent elements are:

In: meaning if
Shaa'a: meaning be, let happen
Allah: meaning God

Inshallah belongs to the many words which are religious in their origin and coined with the help of the word Allah since God is omnipresent in human life and of course particularly in Islam. A lot of Koran verses end with Allah. This overuse of Allah or God is foreign to modern Western culture but still persistent in Islam.

The original principle of Inshallah is that nothing can be guaranteed. It is important to keep in mind that reliability tends to be measured in "the number of 9s" – in other words 99.9 percent because nothing is 100 percent reliable. This lies in the nature of life in general and human nature in particular. Who can then guarantee anything 100 percent? There is always a scenario where something can get lost, change or stop to exist altogether. You can of course try to increase the degree of reliability and reduce the likelihood of failure. This will probably add another 9 to the reliability rating but cannot make it 100 percent bullet proof. There is always force majeure or Act of God. Thus it shows human vulnerability and submission to God.

However, the idea of Inshallah has also undergone some linguistic changes. In modern life it does not refer any more to the degree of likelihood. It has become a very convenient way of avoiding commitment or even refusal when Muslims are embarrassed to give a clear "no" answer. Thus, the idea of reliability is removed completely or even the opposite is meant. Inshallah used this way is a nuisance, unsatisfactory and devoid of meaning. In a way it reflects the Muslim mind in general: never commit yourself to anything. Always leave a door open for recluse. It can also be compared with some nonsense words in German such as Malzeit literally "time to eat" as a form of greeting beginning from 11 O'clock to 3 O'clock pm. This conflicts greatly with West European and North American cultures which expect a 100 percent reliability from nearly everything even from the unreliable technology. The nuisance of Inshallah becomes intolerable in business transactions or when concluding contracts where no escape from commitment or obligations can be accepted. The best way for European and American business people to fight Inshallah mentality is to give the same Inshallah reply when requested by Muslims to commit themselves to anything (the same weapons are the most effective).

The Muslims are not only witnessing major changes in their social, political, religious, economic and other areas, most prominently in technology, but are also confronted with modern concepts like time management and a different understanding of commitments away from the Inshallah mentality because the Act of God is self-explanatory or is implied and does not need to appear on the surface. When Muslims slowly but surely head to a new era of social order i.e. women emancipation and participation, sexual contacts outside wedlock, more respect to animal and human life, more environmental consciousness, modern management practices and new economic systems away from sate monopoly and dependence on oil, new political understanding away from dictators and tyrants and nationalist ideas of a glorious Muslim or Arab past, embark on a new role of Islam away from Jihad, Mullah systems, black and white statements and losing precious time on nonsense introductions like "In the name of God the merciful the benevolent, peace and prayers be on the great prophet" before answering any questions which have no relevance to what they say. The Inshallah mentality will be history then. Arabic or Muslim language will experience big changes and these changes trigger a different way of thinking since thought is dependent on language.

Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim
Bremen - Germany
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (60) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
wrong [125 words]The TruthMar 7, 2008 14:25121999
1re: Kazi's comments [655 words]MaxxOct 31, 2005 20:5427566
In reply to Octavio Johanson [238 words]Peter J. HerzMar 23, 2005 05:3921136
Support of terrorists [89 words]DonvanMar 17, 2005 16:5921045
The price of liberty [61 words]S.C.PandaMar 17, 2005 04:2521036
Moderate Muslims [180 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
KaziMar 15, 2005 16:0921003
The State's reason for existing [78 words]DogzillaMar 9, 2005 20:0220934
The real danger to US national security [251 words]B. AlotaibiMar 8, 2005 13:2520871
that is wrong [67 words]A Muslim GirlOct 18, 2007 22:0720871
Security, Civil Rights or Propaganda [159 words]JohnMar 6, 2005 16:1820707
Abu Ali case [126 words]Reuben IngberMar 6, 2005 07:4020702
More info on ISA [335 words]Ada EvansMar 4, 2005 19:4620665
Liberals and Conservatives both to blame [271 words]Mark GarretsonMar 4, 2005 15:3520663
Definition of treason? [50 words]Patricia KelcherMar 4, 2005 12:1520661
Inshallah [686 words]Dr. Jamshid IbrahimMar 4, 2005 06:5520656
Hatred taught to Muslim youth [93 words]A. WoodsMar 3, 2005 17:5020650
Reform civil liberties and control immigration [140 words]Octavio JohansonMar 3, 2005 16:2920648
Al Qaeda coached to claim torture... [167 words]L. D. WeinerMar 3, 2005 14:5520647
Defeating terrorism [551 words]Derek BernardMar 3, 2005 13:2220645
Balance [296 words]Dan KatcherMar 3, 2005 12:4620644
Time to abandon multi-culturalism [140 words]Octavio JohansonMar 3, 2005 08:0120642
Did 9/11 in fact "more profoundly affect" conservatives than it did liberals? [35 words]Jonathan RickMar 3, 2005 00:4020640
Silent terrorists within [52 words]Richard I. EllisMar 2, 2005 23:5520639
Libs. & Cons. PROFOUNDLY DERANGED [119 words]ChayajaneMar 2, 2005 22:2120638
Bull's Eye! [85 words]Jeremy RabkinMar 2, 2005 20:1720634
Relax [301 words]Werner de RocqerMar 2, 2005 19:3420633
Let the courts decide [89 words]David J. BastyrMar 2, 2005 17:1920632
I choose SECURITY [140 words]Tony FigueroaMar 2, 2005 15:2120631
Mistakes [43 words]Robert PattersonMar 2, 2005 14:3220629
Deportation [151 words]Octavio JohansonMar 2, 2005 14:2020628
WHY! [231 words]Paul RinderleMar 2, 2005 14:1420627
Your correct appraisal of 'Liberalism'.. [80 words]NitsuardMar 2, 2005 14:1220626
We share your fears. [125 words]K. A. KhanMar 2, 2005 12:3220622
Politics and the actual law [146 words]Chad DesLauriersMar 2, 2005 12:1620621
Training on US soil [82 words]WilksMar 2, 2005 10:1720619
Article on Balancing Liberaties [36 words]Annette HughesMar 2, 2005 09:5720618
The problem is that the Saudis can get away with anything! [208 words]Kenneth S. BesigMar 2, 2005 06:3420617
The Abu Ali Case and] Balancing Liberties, Security [29 words]Rachelle Assouline-SeynaeveMar 2, 2005 05:2120616
Black or white fallacy [61 words]Nick GoodMar 2, 2005 04:1420615
Hmmmmm. [36 words]Peter J. HerzMar 1, 2005 23:2620610
Abu... we hardly knew yeh? [88 words]Donald OMar 1, 2005 23:0020609
Life or Liberty [535 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMar 1, 2005 21:4120604
The Abu Ali Case [1 words]Edward MametMar 1, 2005 21:1820601
I am with you, Mr. Pipes [78 words]Carol McLaughlinMar 1, 2005 21:0920600
They don't get it [141 words]RobMar 1, 2005 20:4920599
Abu Ali case [96 words]Darwin S. StamperMar 1, 2005 20:3320598
Impaled on the horns of a very big dilemma [274 words]Darwin BarrettMar 1, 2005 19:5220596
Seeds of our destruction [28 words]Sam Richter MDMar 1, 2005 19:4120595
American Protection from Terrorist Threat [41 words]Charles J PaineMar 1, 2005 18:2520593
Blind [342 words]Donald W. BalesMar 1, 2005 18:2220592
Forget about civil liberties [169 words]Octavio JohansonMar 1, 2005 18:1920591
Exactly right Mr. Pipes [123 words]Paul RhoadsMar 1, 2005 17:5920589
Frightening! [36 words]Nathan RothMar 1, 2005 17:4120588
Has Bush hatred gone so far that we feel no outrage? [72 words]Northern VirginiastanMar 1, 2005 17:0420587
Accurate [45 words]Jeremiah J. SpiresMar 1, 2005 16:5720586
Liberals are losing their brains [45 words]bashaMar 1, 2005 16:3220585
A necessary choice [41 words]Herbert B. BorteckMar 1, 2005 16:3020583
Freedom First [304 words]PatMar 1, 2005 16:2520582
The press and propaganda re Abu Ali [54 words]S. Vladimer LTC USAR RetMar 1, 2005 15:5520581
Another Way of Assessing the Question [405 words]Leonard DeutchmanMar 1, 2005 15:1520579

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)