Arguing against "Limited" Strikes on the Assad Regime

Submitted by BALARABE ABBA (Nigeria), Aug 28, 2013 at 03:53

The American and Western interest in Syria is neither to topple Assad nor help the rebels. None of them is a choice. The American and Western policy in middle east to justify invasion is nothing more than to weaken Arab countries militarily. This policy was made clear by none other than Leon Panetta in one of his out going policy comments. "We will make sure that Israel is the only military power in Middle east"

As one awaits for the way and method for that to be done - Simple!

1. Use Agent Provocateurs to justify attack or invasion.

2. Limited Strikes, means only destruction of the country's militarily - not necessarily overthrowing the regime.

But fail to take serious issues into consideration.

thanks

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".