Let's see if it is inappropriate and undefying?

Submitted by Brutus Balan (Australia), Oct 21, 2013 at 01:36

Nick Lim: Why is this article inappropriate and what annoys you about this? You want to know how the Church of Jesus Christ is edified by this article? Consider this:

1. The article exposes those who claim to be Christians clamoring for this Arabic Moon-god, 'Allah'

2. It exposes Islam as a false rellgion without context but for its reference to the Bible.

3. It informs of the danger in calling 'Allah' as the God of tthe Bible.

4. It warns of the danger of the possible Islamization of ignorant 'Chrsitians' not necessarily to be Muslims but to think that Muslims are their brethren of the Abrahamic faith, hence not evangelising them.

5. It gives Muslims grounds to mock Christians as people who do not have a name for their God hence they have to borrow from Islam.

6. Most of all, the excerpts chosen by the 3rd Judge taken from my article had the Gospel of Jesus Christ well articulated within inadvertently 'preached' by the Judge and now read by many in Malaysia. Aren't you glad?

7. The portions chosen by the Judge also spoke of Allah as the Arabian Moon-god exposing Islam.

Now what was that you felt was inappropriate and unedifying to the people of God?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".