The Qur'an is a corrupted and edited book! Oh my evidence? read and enjoy

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 28, 2014 at 10:28

Our dear Awang read the likes of the fake and big time liar Maududi

As a matter of facts, all the ayats of the Qur'an were revealed from Allah through the service of the angel directly to the Prophet p.b.u.h.

Really? then it should be easy for you our dear Awang to prove to us the following

1. There is only one god

2. This god is Allah

3. There are creatures called angels

4. There is an angel called Gabriel

5. There was an Arabian warlord and caravan raider whose name is Muhammad

6. And last this Gabriel spoke to him on behalf of your Allah

Now you provide with hard and solid evidence. Now Go! and make a fool of yourself

The following will not be accepted as evidence

1. Bacause the Qur'an says so

2. My Mullah told me so

3. Zakir Naik says so

Now Go

The angel recited the verses which were then repeated and memorized by the Prophet,

Really? were you there?

and followed by teaching them to his companions. For this reason, the verses of the Qur'an are truly the verses of Allah the One and Only Mighty God in their original revelation. Not only original by sentence, they are maintained in their originality through their every single word, letter and punctuations.\

Well then how do you explain that if you read the Cairo Qur'an the word ملك is edited as مالِكِ or Maaliki or the onwer of and if you read the same word in the Tunisian Qur'an it is edited as ملِكِ Maliki or the king of and it is either the king of or the owner so which one is it our dear Awang al-tablighee?

Do you know what this very simple example means?

1. It means that the Qur'an is an edited and corrupted book and edited by the ulama

2. It means that the Qur'an could not have been memorized but a written text otherwise there would have been no difference between both Qur'ans

3. It means that it is a blatant lie to claim that all Qur'ans are the same

4. It means that the so called al-Lawh al-Mahfuz is a big fat lie after all is it maaliki or is it malki in al-Lawh al-Mahfuz you tell us our dear Awang the lost tablighee

Here is another bigger disaster al-Tabari provides three readings that are very different for the word يَعْصِرُونَ in surat Yusuf 49

1. يَعْصِرُونَ or ya3siruun (the first letter is a Y)

2. تَعْصِرُونَ " بِالتَّاءِ , or Ta3siruun with a Ta (T)

3. يُعْصَرُونَ " بِمَعْنَى : يُمْطَرُونَ or Yu3saruun and the meaning is yumataruun or to have rain!

Do you know what this means our dear Awang? let me help you

1. The Qur'an was a text and was not recitation otherwise this word would not have been a problem

2. It means that al-Tabari was dealing with a written text that was still unstable

3. It means by him telling Muslims how to read the word that he was indeed instrumental in fixing the defective Quranic text

4. And how can Muslims canonize a book that they cannot read or agree on what it says before stabilizing such text and more evidence that the Qur'an could not have been canonized before al-Tabri or the third century of Islam as Wansbrough believed

5. it also means that there must have been a period between the time when the Quranic material was written and the attempts by the ullama to find what this opaque revelation is saying and it could be one of two things: The Quranic material pre-dates Muhammad or the Qur'an was not canonized until the time of al-tabari but by then no one had a clue that this book was all about

6. It also means that the so called al-Lawh al-Mahfuz or Allah's tablet is a bogus claim as this word would exist in only one form so how do we know which one of al-Tabari's readings exist in Allah's tablet

7. The fact that such word can be read in three different ways is that the Qur'an is an EDITED book or corrupted book

What a disaster the Qur'an is a corrupted book

You see our dear Awang Maududi was either ignorant or he was a blatant liar so which one was he and you are no more than another victim of such liar

Now it is your turn to and you must pardon me make a fool of yourself again! Go!

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".