"Terrorism" is simply the crime of EXTORTION writ large!

Submitted by Uncle Vladdi (Canada), Jun 2, 2015 at 22:31

Extortion is threats, and threats have to be backed up by dire consequences (violence) to be believable.

"Terrorism" is really only the crime of extortion, (aka: slander, bullying, intimidation, coercion,

duress, extortion, "terrorism" - all forms of robbery, in other words;) so why have our complicit

accessory governments decided to enable this crime by pretending to re-define it based on only the

extorting criminals' own excuse for it (that God made them commit their crimes!)?

Subjective threats (not objective warnings) are all crimes of extortion, even if they fail (because

attempted crimes are still crimes).

The difference between threats and warnings is sequence: a valid warning posits "IF/when YOU decide to

attack first/commit an action, THEN I will respond with/this will happen.

Threats involve a statement of attack: "I will kill you!" A legal threat is one in response to an attack.

A threat/attack may be phrased as a warning, but involve a criminal attack: "If you don't hand over your

wallet, I will shoot you!"

Also, unexplained warnings also really only ever amount to threats ("I wouldn't do that if I were you!")

Are any other crimes ever actually defined by the perpetrator's choice of excuse for them?!

Except for responding in self defense to physical violence, physical attacks are crimes.

Is there a category called "Murder, but with the excuse that God made the murderer do it!"?

Without the defense of Truth, verbal attacks are crimes of slander, libel, and fraud, while

with the defense of Truth, they are usually valid accusations of others crimes.

It's always a case of One or the other.

Is there a category in law called "Lies and threats God told us to tell about our enemies!"?

Governments are made up of idolatrous brand salesmen selling their group rights excuses, so they

automatically choose to go along with everyone else's similarly fraudulent claims; the"Government" of

Saudi Arabia, for instance, embodies the origin-point of the islamic crime syndicate, so for our

representatives to validly assert that islam is only an extortion racket, would be to correctly de-

legitimize the Saudi government.

Since the Saudi government is based on sharia law, which is based on the Qur'an and holds that there is no

need for secular governments nor leaders, for our leaders in stead to kow-tow to the fiction that the

Saudis are anything more than a gang of criminals is in itself a crime, perpetrated upon all the non-

moslem human individual citizens of the world.

"Wahhabists," "Al-Quaeda," the "Moslem Brotherhood," "the Taliban," and "ISIS/ISILam," are all merely

sub-categorical symptoms of islam's "holy" extortion racket/official doctrines of criminal "Jihad."

To pretend these effects are their own causes, dissociated from their real cause and true identity - islam

and moslems - is a crime.

To ignore that islam is only an ancient, ongoing extortion racket crime-syndicate, while pretending that

only some ill-defined, "misunderstanding, radical extremist" elements of it, are only vaguely associated

with "terrorism," is an obvious form of criminal negligence perpetrated by those who pretend to be our

"leaders in government," against the rest of us.

Islam is extortion, period. Extortion is crime. Moslems are criminals.

Enablers are criminals and traitors.

So, my message to our government leaders, to their corporazi sales-masters, and to their pet media which

commits massive fraud through their ongoing crimes of public deception, is simply: Either admit it, or

find your choice to ignore it has defined yourself a complicitly negligent criminal accessory enabler of

the global crime gang of holy mobsters called islam.

Are the people temporarily hired to make laws in government, entitled to make up their own definitions of

crime and law, or is there a simple SCIENCE OF LAW they should adhere to?

Of course there is - law and morality is based on cause and effect, attack or response; it is NOT to be

based on idolatorus "spiritual" notions of effects pretending to be their own causes.

The Law is not to be based on frauds or lies (on self-serving thefts of the Truth;) the Law is not to be

based on crimes.

---

The Qur'an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews

are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered

for their "crime" of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur'an:

1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;

2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;

3: Allah made them both like that;

4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims' heads.

(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him)."

...

It's all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all

specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn't by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to

either chapter 8 or 9).

...

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it's main tenet: that God is a

violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and

murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

At WORST, all REAL religions only say:

"Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/'the gods') will get you!"

...but ONLY islam says:

"Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you ('for god')!"

A forced 'Faith!' ISN'T a "Faith!" at all - it's only extortion, and extortion is always a CRIME.

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in "allah," you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be

arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of "faith" in your crime-god will help us to do

so.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".