69 million page views

Elaine

Reader comment on item: Muslim "No-go Zones" in Europe?

Submitted by elaine (United States), Dec 3, 2015 at 13:40

Interesting discussion Mr Pipes. I commend you for having the courage to enter these forbidden areas that for you were seemingly not no-go zones but turned out to be reasonably safe for an innocuous tall unidentified Jewish male who posed no discernible threat. As a Jewish woman I would not have the courage to do the same for the obvious reason that a lone woman in western attire would attract attention and create danger since women aren't viewed in the same way.

Amazing to me we've allowed these areas to fester ignored mostly by government because they're treated as hostile interlopers though government has every right to enter these areas. They've become no-go for many reasons that mostly reflect poorly on the host countries who allow these non-assimilated people to become citizens (and to radicalize) in the first place. Molenbeek is described as a terrorist factory for radicalization.

I'm not surprised your concrete incident wasn't addressed. Why would it be. These places conjure up fear for most of us. Terrorism is on the rise. Two terrorist incidents here in the states, one today in CA and last week in CO Springs though it hasn't been proven yet to be terrorist related. Still, these incidents feel more common place and exacerbate our personal safety concerns. Extremism is an omnipresent reality in the west. Our denial and acceptance of Muslims makes no sense even if the silent Muslim moderates are basically good people (so I'm told)The Parisian attacks reflect a PC denial that Muslim extremism exists. This is changing. Borderless countries that continue to accept these people are setting themselves up for more attacks/disaster. ISIS has grown bold largely sanctioned by Obama who has fed this mess with his refusal to acknowledge reality. Things feel for me very tenuous and most certainly for the Jews in Europe whose fear factor decibel is now on high alert.

Your no-go ventures are admirable & bold, and you make your point. I'm actually glad to know you felt safe enough to visit these places.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Reader comments (38) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Subject forward 2017 [28 words]RMay 3, 2017 09:40238949
No go zones [169 words]claude varnerMay 2, 2017 08:19238937
7Treason Zones [15 words]HaldrikDec 11, 2015 07:45226918
3Muslim Expansionists Exploit the Traitorous Greed & Christophobia of the Liberals. [88 words]Nur el Masih ben HaqDec 9, 2015 18:56226899
3No-go-Zones of Muslims in Europe. [59 words]ShyamalDec 9, 2015 05:54226892
1No go [33 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
William PapkeDec 6, 2015 15:16226834
8Not safe for all? Not good enough, is it? [112 words]LesDec 6, 2015 14:55226831
We went through this sort of thing in the US [171 words]SandraDec 29, 2015 10:13226831
Wow. [83 words]AlbertMar 2, 2016 17:37226831
Denmark? [161 words]SAKOVKTDec 4, 2015 22:08226802
4Converting people out of Islam will be a noble cause [160 words]PrashantDec 3, 2015 23:26226788
2Proper Behavior [79 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Tim GilleyDec 3, 2015 17:34226782
3But I thought? [133 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
JerryDec 3, 2015 17:01226780
2Try entering a Muslim zone in London [9 words]lida SolomonDec 3, 2015 15:49226779
1Berlin [16 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
KoljaDec 3, 2015 15:29226778
1No-go for women without hijabs? [15 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Elbe FinnDec 3, 2015 14:35226774
5No safe passage? No services! [139 words]Barry GoldbergDec 3, 2015 13:43226772
3Agree on Cutting Services [84 words]AaronDec 5, 2015 12:42226772
2Elaine [339 words]elaineDec 3, 2015 13:40226771
Go no Go. [11 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
steven LDec 3, 2015 11:07226768
The EU Needs Israeli Intervention [251 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DaveDec 3, 2015 10:04226767
2Your Enemy Will Do This [161 words]JerryDec 4, 2015 02:49226767
2Let Me Clarify [94 words]DaveDec 4, 2015 08:37226767
2talk about colonialism..... [59 words]AlanDec 14, 2015 18:23226767
1MARSEILLES [110 words]Mashall LundbergDec 3, 2015 10:00226766
3No Go Zone [45 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
SAKOVKTDec 3, 2015 07:44226763
2"No-go ethnicities", perhaps? [125 words]ETDec 3, 2015 07:27226762
1Re. the rock throwing incident [47 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Gabriel NivaschDec 3, 2015 05:54226761
1more fitting term [5 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ECAWDec 3, 2015 04:42226760
Uncivil neighborhoods [169 words]HarvDec 2, 2015 23:48226757
3They don't want anything reminding them that it's not Muslim soverign territory [44 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Anon.Dec 2, 2015 23:21226756
why visit Molenbeek, the forgotten new language divide in Belgium in Europe [338 words]mythDec 5, 2015 12:34226756
2The linked Politico Belgium article also applies to America's Urban Violence [122 words]Mike ConlonDec 17, 2015 18:37226756
4San Bernardino shooting: We need to take away guns, and admit more refugees. [242 words]Michael SDec 2, 2015 23:04226755
making the point [75 words]LesDec 8, 2015 11:59226755
San Bernadino [68 words]JonDec 11, 2015 13:37226755
1Sorry for the discrepancy -- point made, though. [112 words]Michael SDec 12, 2015 06:35226755
4We no longer have law enforcement: It's become just another extension of politics [111 words]Michael SDec 12, 2015 06:42226755

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)