Not safe for all? Not good enough, is it?

Submitted by Les (United States), Dec 6, 2015 at 14:55

Dr. Pipes notes that his behavior had to be quite neutral, civilian and not show any evidence of religious affiiliation, unless Islamic. This precludes the safety workers from entering. This precludes Jews and Christians. This prevents a girl in tight jeans. In other words, it is a no-go zone for many members of the liberal democratic society that actually is providing it support.

It remains unacceptable. All city services should be cut off--water, power, garbage--until the inhabitants are willing to behave like citizens of the country that feeds and shelters them. Police units should engage in shock and awe campaigns to eliminate the lawelessness, plural marraige, and drug dealing these areas support.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".