i.e: "HA HA THE TERRORISTS TERRIFIED YOU, YOU WUSSIES!"

Submitted by UNCLE VLADDI (Canada), Sep 12, 2016 at 19:09

Wow! Talk about victim-blaming suicidally masochistic virtue-signalling! ACADEMIC TREASON!

Perhaps the good "professor" should look up "Stockholm Syndrome" and look in a mirror!

He's gone out of his way to present symptoms AS causes, as any 'good' academic these days will do!

He notices that people ARE terrified (of terrorists) and then disparages them as being irrational for it!

As if being terrified of being terrorized was somehow an irrational, immoral and shamefully ignorant act which only the worst sort prejudicially biased hoi-paloi bigots would engage in, and never the learned elites of storied academia! So this attempt of his is obviously to use the statistical data of the people rightly and appropriately - as the muslims themselves openly clearly and officially intend - terrorized by the terrorists, to validate the false "islamophobia" narrative and blame the victims while supporting the criminals, all in a selfish and cowardly bid to hold the bully's coat and say

"I'm not with them! Take them first, not me!"

I have never seen such an obvious case of craven treason so openly celebrated!

So, in having thus assiduously studied the effects of terrorism on its victims, and baselessly declared their positions untenable, he has excused himself and his colleagues from having to actually do any research into investigating the validity of the actual causes of it all!

He isn't presenting reasons, only excuses to ignore condone and enable the criminal actions of the holy mobster "muslim" members of the ongoing global crime-gang called "islam!"

And he got lauded by his incestuous cohorts as some sort of wunderkind for this academic sleight-of-hand, and none of them thought - or cared - that those of us he thus slandered would notice, or that our taking note of his derision towards our plight wouldn't matter to those complicit traitors in charge of us who are even now still very actively engaged in enabling it?

Dr. Pipes, you could always sue him for libel and defamation. On behalf of all of us "hoi-paloi."

Just an idea ... one which would be much appreciated; I'd even contribute some money towards it!

;-)

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".