69 million page views

A victory-based escapist party?

Reader comment on item: Ariel Sharon, Escapist

Submitted by Camelinspace (Israel), Dec 31, 2018 at 12:24

Ironically the only party that clearly promotes a victory agenda regarding the Palestinian century-long war on Israel is Feiglin's Zehut ("Identity") party, a Libertarian party that stresses it's separation from right/left politics.. While to my knowledge he has never mentioned your Israel Victory program, there is no mistaking this party's agenda for something other than a clear cut victory regarding the Palestinians.

Minute 2:00-2:30 of their YouTube peace plan commercial shows my point:
https://youtu.be/gJG-Y1oaJ6A

I'm not saying that Zehut's platform has merit, only arguing that this party is in the mindset for an end to the conflict in their way. It will also be interesting to see if they make it into the Knesset. Arguably comparable to the European civilizationist parties, this unusual Israeli party might prompt the conflict management-minded center-right and center-left to take a look at your comparatively tame Israel Victory paradigm, since yours doesn't require full annexation of the territories.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I would not call Feiglin's party escapist; it does not fit any of the criteria, especially trying to combine left and right.

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (34) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
A victory-based escapist party? [153 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
CamelinspaceDec 31, 2018 12:24246895
sharons'second creation [134 words]leo solomonDec 1, 2005 13:4029248
Conclusion beats Premise [124 words]Diego FramatoDec 1, 2005 13:3529246
Sharon - The Israeli Gaius Marius [136 words]The HistorianDec 1, 2005 00:0429207
Likud marries Labor [219 words]JayNov 30, 2005 21:3129194
Not a good analogy [198 words]JoshuaNov 30, 2005 12:0429150
Short-lived? Perhaps. Dangerous? Certainly! [99 words]Josh GNov 30, 2005 08:4929131
Tabula Rasa [321 words]yuval brandstetterNov 29, 2005 17:0129045
Shas - escapist par excellence [68 words]David GuyNov 29, 2005 15:2529015
The ball is not in Sharon's court [52 words]David W. LincolnNov 29, 2005 12:4928999
An Annex of the U.S.? [160 words]Jack LassNov 29, 2005 11:4728994
Response to Jack Lass's Annex of US [169 words]ubangiNov 29, 2005 21:5828994
New Party [92 words]Thomas Earl CannadyNov 29, 2005 10:4328990
History won't repeat itself [32 words]Efrat YaariNov 29, 2005 05:2428969
Kadima: Sharon's Ego Party [142 words]Frederick J. Bainhauer IIINov 29, 2005 01:0928962
Read Revelation 22: 18-19 [88 words]Dale EhrgottNov 28, 2005 23:4128958
Short but maybe not so sweet [83 words]ubangiNov 28, 2005 21:3728948
What is good for the country [107 words]BATYA DAGANNov 28, 2005 21:3328947
Unprincipled, Self-Centrist, Communist Sharon [247 words]orange yonasonNov 28, 2005 21:2428946
Sharon's 'Great Leap Leftwards' predicted by Dr.Pipes [79 words]Ben van de PolderNov 28, 2005 20:2728945
Ariel Sharon [148 words]Arlinda DeAngelisNov 28, 2005 20:1828943
Reply To Arlinda DeAngelis [278 words]Mu'een Ud DeenNov 29, 2005 16:1328943
Baruch Hashem! [338 words]John W. McGinleyNov 28, 2005 19:5728941
Kadima [9 words]Roger W. TalbotNov 28, 2005 17:2228935
Selective facts make for questionable analysis [155 words]Yair WeinstockNov 28, 2005 17:1028934
Future of Kadima [137 words]steven lNov 28, 2005 16:4328932
Sharon is the issue, not his party [272 words]Jean SavoyeNov 28, 2005 16:3028930
Labor is Escapist [46 words]Gamaliel IsaacNov 28, 2005 16:2928929
escapist parties [63 words]george glanczNov 28, 2005 15:5528925
"Escapist", Sharon [26 words]Rabbi Jerome AbramsNov 28, 2005 15:5028924
I agree with your 2-nd point only conditionally. [52 words]agNov 28, 2005 15:4128923
Ariel Sharon, a deeply flawed individual [358 words]Kenneth S. BesigNov 28, 2005 14:4928921
Sharon is a centrist , not an escapist (as in disengagement) [32 words]Kalman NeumanNov 28, 2005 14:4928920
Thank you, Dr.Pipes... [160 words]Merle C. FraserNov 28, 2005 14:4828919

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)