Further Proposition of World Finance Models Competition When Coorperation is Indicated

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Jan 5, 2022 at 11:02

And Readeer Prashant once again expands an intelligent premise; that Turkey (and it is not alone in this world of cutthroat financial schemes-prisons are filled then emptied with financial 'pirates' preying on destitute populations-and those are merely the ones who got caught-politicians being the special cases that have governmental protections, here in America and world-wide) operates in somewhat of a vacuum when its economy should be able to support its people, but cannot for its variant determination of how to employ the nations resources in order to impose Erdoğan's model of a revived Ottoman caliphate.
In concert, that requires for his model to be more efficient to his needs, he needs to find partners in commerce inorder to build a wealth model that increases its value in an environment that thrives in a Barbary Coast convention of finances. Yet, here is a problem: as Reader Prashant appropriately advises, not all of what would be a compatible environment engages in such business practices that would benefit Erdoğan's plan of operating his Turkey; they are then, competitors. Therein lays the conundrum. Turkey is then compelled to compromise as has the more successful Islamic enterprises or contiunue in isolation. Turkey in isolation becomes dependent on like thinking in the Islamic world where fnances are dominated in the Muslim mindset and implementation of Shar'ia precepts or face moderating that stance and engaging in the world competition along with the Russian/Chinese attempts to swallow the lion's share of finances and be prepared to pay up when notes of finance are called.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".