|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
"Civilationism" v. "Civilization State"Reader comment on item: Denmark Leads the West to Immigration Sanity Submitted by Robert Blumenblatt (United States), Nov 1, 2022 at 00:46 Dear Dr, Daniel Pipes, I have found that "Civilizationism" does occur on a Google search it seems to be still a Neologism. I could not find an entry for it in the Merriam Webster dictionary, nor did i find a Wikipedia article on it. However, I did discover that the expression "Civilization State" is used in scholarly articles and that it has an entry in Wikipedia. The latter was first used in relation to China in the early 1990s and it is used in contradistinction to Huntington's 1993 famous article, "Class of Civilizations." Apparently, Huntington was wrong to the extent that Westphalian Nation-States would struggle with one another. In this later usage, China, Russia, India, the United States are the Civilization States; these are kind of Neo-Empires in this latest scholarship. In accordance with your usage and study of Civilization Parties of Europe, it appears that these institutions are part of the discourse or dialectics of the emerging European Union Civilization State, shedding its Liberal Enlightenment past and resorting to its common Traditional Western European (Christian) Civilization, contradictory as it may appear at first glance. A wonderful article for this subject is the following: 2021 3-13 "New World Fracture Civilizationism and the Failure of Global Liberalism" - Ronan O'Callaghan There is also this useful article cited elsewhere (as I cited it once before to you), but I could not access it online today: 2017 12-6 "New Language of European Populism" - Rogers Brubaker
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (24) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |