US and THEM...

Submitted by Thomas Justin Kaze (Australia), Aug 18, 2006 at 03:48

Us, them (them, them)…

Truly, I could attach my comment to any of Mr. Daniel Pipes’ weblogs – I regard him, along with Dr. Ali Sina of the FFI, one of my – our – greatest allies in this war that we have not started; I also apologize to Mr. Pipes and his staff for my earlier suggestions as to what military tactics should be used to deter the enemies and make them think twice before they make their next move – I did mean what I had written, to the letter; if those methods are not employed – we lose.

... I started my war on Islam (yes, Islam in its entirety) back in the early nineties, in Japan, upon having encountered a surprisingly large number of young, aggressive Muslims, mainly from Pakistan and Iran, although the latter ones tended to display more common sense and intelligence and seldom displayed jihadi characteristics – unlike, for example, a certain Chechen dude, Mr. Omar Shishani (check Google).

Oh but Japan is not Europe or the US of Arms; there are no CAIR-like organizations who would force Islam down the throats of the most steel-like Nation of the world. Japan does have guts – sites like “Islam in Japan” (that promote “the peaceful Islam”, of course) are truly pathetic and I wonder whether Japan and Islam can, or ever will, have anything in common. On the ‘Previous Forum’ of the Mishima Yukio Cyber Museum, you can find my pronouncements, some of them dated as early as 1998 – call them what you will. Thanks G-d(s), Japan is – or seems to be – immune to Islam. The question is now, Europe.

In Europe, the leftists’ slogan is “Your hatred of Islam has long overwhelmed your hatred of Nazism and Communism; you have all become intolerant and insane!”. Well, sadly the contemporary Islam has developed in the direction of a barbaric ideology and racial and religious intolerance, a war of violent proselytism, denigration of all other faiths and of atheism, and a blunt and senseless medieval mumbo-jumbo, where some ten minutes into a discussion, every Muslim will openly declare his hatred for others’ convictions, his total lack of acceptance thereof, his open contempt for other than his, values, and a total disdain for womenfolk – including his own. Cute, ain’t it? It seems that the Islamic “civilization” (excuse me?) has stepped onto the path of the new exclusionism, or indeed, fascism.

The young Muslims in Europe are “disenchanted” (with what, exactly?), “dissociated” (how can we be surprised!), “marginalized” (their own doing!) and, of course, angry with the fact that their host countries have not yet become Islamic, allowing them to rape indiscriminately and get away with it (try Australia or Scandinavia); angry at being profiled and discriminated against, when they commit most of the known and yet unknown, crimes. Racism, they cry, of course; oh but Muslims are not a race – but we have been through this before.

The Muslim brains have been poisoned to the degree that they have become unable to tell right from wrong, light from darkness or progress from regress. All the anachronic pillars of Islam that could, but did not, get enlightened, have been sabotaged and moved toward the radical extremism, that is nowadays being excused even by the so-called modern intellectuals and, of course, the “moderate” Muslim circles. And the most incomprehensible thing is that every stoning of a raped woman (in the name of Allah, of course!), every ritual beheading of an “infidel” and every terrorist attack is being blamed on the infidel West (they resist Islam!) while no self-criticism can ever be seen applied. The Islamic conduct versus animals, women or infidels is not even allowed to be criticized, lest CAIR sues you, and wins – who, I am asking, is the REAL enemy?

Islamophobia? Let me tell you who the real Islamophobe is: the way I see it, it is the one who fears Muslims to the degree that he does everything they want him to do; one who freaks out when called Islamophobic and embraces Islam in fear of being branded racist, as if they were, indeed, a race. War on Terror is not the War on Islam – unless Muslims equate Islam with terror, or otherwise. But then again, has there ever been Islam without terror? And what do we do with those “innocent” Muslims who officially condemn acts of terror, but frown upon hearing their terrorist brethren called ‘dogs’ and hurry with excuses like “they are only a bunch of young, misguided hotheads”? I am so sorry for upsetting Muslims – but they are always upset, furious, angry or outraged; it seems that they are born that way! Is there a way to make them happy, or to please them... without dying and making more room for them?

I recall the weblog “Sue the Saudis” (D.P., February 18, 2002) - and see it through the French eyes: Jacques Chirac openly declaring that France is ready to retaliate against any country behind any act of terror committed on the French soil - and I read it as “nuke” instead of “sue”.

As Dr. Ali Sina wrote in his piece “Viva Oriana” (FFI, July 13, 2006), we have three choices in front of us:

a) Rapidly spread the truth about Islam and wean Muslims (away) from this (deadly) cult. (Wishful thinking, methinks).

b) Prepare ourselves to become second-class citizens in our own countries, or be slain by the Muslim sword (This is for those PC morons who have no honor.)

c) Smash Muslims so brutally that they can never raise their heads (again) and dream of conquering the world and reducing us into dhimmitude or dealing with us with the sword. (They want to die for Allah - why not facilitate their pious desire?)

Finally, re comments to “Plans destroyed”. Caleb White (“You’re kidding”) obviously does not understand that Concerned Infidel (“Alienating Muslims”) is being sarcastic - he is kidding, let me assure you, Caleb.

Thomas Justin Kaze

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".