Reply to Faisal

Submitted by Amitabh tripathi (India), Aug 25, 2006 at 00:43

Mr Faisal I still stick to my words that you are a Muslim first, who believe in propganda rather than debate. You have again presented name of some patriotic Muslims and tried to portray them as representative of mainstream Muslim community. Actually they are a tiny minority within this community. If any Muslim in India will be said to recite the name of 20 patriotic Muslims in one breath it would be impossible for him . Abdul Hamid, president Abdul Kalam represent tiny minority within Muslim community who are Indian first and Muslim later. How many Muslims recite Gita as President does.

Your response in Godhra episode is not convincing . I want to remind you of your previous statement in which you said Kar sevaks tried to molest one girl , but now your theory has limited itself to teasing a girl . Dont you see difference between teasing and molesting and this was claimed by prosecution only.

Mr Faisal as you are repeatedly using word terrorist for RSS and Bajrang dal is sufficient enough to drag in court for defamation suit, becuause terrorism has a specific definition in legal language. Dont try to balance Islamic terrorism with false propaganda of Hindu funadmentalism.

As you have mentioned major terrorist activities were handiwork of Kashmiri identity. This is a big lie . Master mind of Varansi blasts Md Zubair was running madrassa in Baghpat district of western Up, an Imam of Phulpur Waliullah was arrested in this connection by UP STF. Investigation of Mumbai blasts also reveled participation of local Muslims. Mr Faisal open your eyes to grim reality and do not live in state of denial. You are no more different from Islamic apologists world wide, those who on the one hand support terrorism by balancing it with conspiracy theories as 9\11 was engineered by America and Israel along with false propganda of atrocity on Muslims, and on the other claim in public Islam is religion of peace and violence has no place in Islam. This is a form of intellectual terrorism when intellectuals intimidate other views to such extent with their false propaganda that opposite views should develop sense of guilt or inferiority in themselves .

If followers of Islam has so much hatred for violence they should come on streets to pronounce it in same proportion as they came to demonstrate publication of caricature of their propphet or they often come against America or Israel.

Your logic for Baburi structure is nothing other than stupid attempt to legitimise Muslim claim on this site. Your logic is a dangerous phenomenon which indicate that Muslims in India is not going to follow the verdict of court in Ram temple issue if it goes against them. How much respect Indian Muslms have for nationa is clear to everyone with their decision to bycott national song. What other example Indians need to reach the conclusion that religion is not personal affair for Muslims .

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".