what's past..

Submitted by donvan (United States), Sep 25, 2006 at 15:33

"What's past is Prologue", of course wishing and hoping that the Mohammedians will slip back in the bottle... Mohammedian teaching is clear, the meaning is not hyperbole, his ideology is complete: the subjugation of the planet by forced conversion, intimidation, violence and terror. ...

The degree to which Mohammedism has been internalized is in direct proportion to the propensity to commit violence and damage on any who are seen as being non Mohammedian.

We all have hope that a strong "Moderate" sect will develop which will reject violence. This seems unlikely to occur. We can now evaluate the hordes behavior and control the populations. We should challenge the Mohammedic dogma at every turn. Quote those critical of the Mohammedic enterprise, challenge them every turn. This notion that we must not upset the Mohammedians is not a concern we should have. We have the freedom to speak. There is no need to restrain ourselves simply because the subject may be unpleasant to some. Were this the case, freedom of speech would be meaningless. It is this implied intimidation by the perpetual "Victims" of Mohammed. It seems that Mohammedians are either victims or rulers.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".