CAIR

Submitted by Noah Wilk (United States), Apr 6, 2007 at 14:55

Moderate Muslim wrote:

MM: "I will indeed try to involve Cair. But I have a sneaking suspicion that you do not actually want to converse with them, you just want to make a mockery of them. And they are not a mockery. So dont call them a mockery in front of me. The people I have met there have been extraordinarily qualified. Their intent is good. Their commitment is true. They are righteous, and they are patriots."

You're either insane, ignorant of reality, or lying through your teeth. I'll permit you to tell us which of the three options it is. CAIR is a terror front group. Here's a few links to enlighten those who have any doubts about CAIR's terrorist support function:

http://www.pipelinenews.org/index.cfm?page=elashi120506.htm

http://www.meforum.org/article/916

Look at what CAIR's chairman, Omar Ahmad, said about Islam in America: "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to be dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth."This CAIR member and terrorist endorser also praised suicide/homicide bombers in a convention in Chicago:

Addressing a youth session at the 1999 Islamic Association for Palestine's annual convention in Chicago, CAIR founder Omar Ahmad praised suicide bombers who "kill themselves for Islam," according to a transcript provided by terror expert Steve Emerson's Investigative Project. "Fighting for freedom, fighting for Islam, that is not suicide," Ahmad asserted. "They kill themselves for Islam."

Go to Jihadwatch.org and research their true intent.

No honest person in their right mind who is not in denial can call CAIR an American patriot group or deny its terrorist intents. You are right about them not being a mockery though. They're not. They're the real thing, ie the true face of Islam. Terrorist supporting, Islamo-centric, and hostile to their host country.

Moderate Muslim, I am convinced that you are merely another one of Michel's multiple personalities. You use the same flawed logic, the same ignorance of fact and reality, the same avoidance tactics that Michel used. Your "research" is just as superficial and flawed as his, and your present it in the same way. Michel mysteriously took another drama queen exit right when you started posting tons of material. Coincidence? I think not.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".