|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharon is fading awayReader comment on item: Reading Sharon's Mind Submitted by john mcginley (United States), Dec 23, 2003 at 12:41 Sharon is old and getting tired. He knows his days as Prime Minister, if not, indeed, his days absoltely, are numbered. He's guessing that Labor will be smart enough to nominate a centrist as candidate for PM. such a person might win and pretty soon Israel would backslide to the mentality it had before Sept. of 2001. Thus Sharon understands that it is now or never for some sort of final arrangement, whether negotiated or not. He is a realist. He has always acknowledged the need to make "painful" decisions concerning the settlements. He is doing such now. The balancing act he must engage in given Israel's dependency on the United States is enough to give one vertigo. But he seems to be holding a steady course with his eye on the prize: some sort of final arrangment, nogotiated or not, before he retires. If he pulls it off he will go down in history as a statesman at least the equal to Ben Gurion (who, you will recall, had a few serious warts of his own). The blindness of most Jews living today will keep the following from being acknolwedged for a about fifty years. but History will Judge sharon's walk on the Temple Mount as the dramatic catylyst which saved the Modern State of Israel. Withou that brave and calculated "stroll" Israel would have, by default, inaugurated a slow but sure slide into oblivion. The analogy is not perfect, but if Ben Gurion is Israel's Washington, Sharon is Isreal's Lincoln. Shalom!Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (49) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |