Obama Did and Continues to Lie. Only in the U.K.-- Though It Isn't Funny

Submitted by Sofa Sogood (United States), May 18, 2008 at 21:46

Reading the plethora of articles made me laugh and laugh, as i thought how ridiculous and how tiny the minds of them must be..."The man himself who should be an expert on himself ... a blind person can see colours that these people much prefer lies deciet and characer assination than reality..."

But it's you who prefer lies and deceit to reality. It's not questioned that he is a Christian now. But, the "man himself" has said many times, "I have never been a Muslim." "I have never practiced Islam."

This statement has been proven to be a lie many times. Haven't you done any reading? For one, read the NY Times Op-Ed "President Apostate?" by Edward N. Luttwak. Even the NY Times which supports Obama has at last printed the truth. If there are some that don't believe his personal background is important, they've a right to that opinion. But his deliberate lies about his background is a disqualifying character flaw. (It's you, yourself who condemn "lies and deceit.")

... Still people fighting against progress and change? it must be that they are still in their caves!

The Obama Saint has been given to us out of the dirtiest, nastiest and most corrupt political machines in our country -- the South Side of Chicago. If he didn't believe in the political and racist ravings of his Rev. Wright for 20 years, then the only conclusion is that he stayed in that Church solely for the purpose of the political powers that he was hoping to gain by it. Twenty years of either racism or deceit -- take your pick. No need to go into how close his associations have been to some of the sleaziest of rip-off artists of the poor! Not to mention his close association with Ayres, who just two years ago, when asked about his bombing of the Pentagon in the 60's (for which he was acquitted on a legal technicality), said he wished he had done more!

What "progress and change" are you talking about? New Platitudes? New Bromides? New Slogans? Appeasement of the Abominable? Social Programs without regard to economic feasibility that wind up harming more than they help? Is that what makes you happy? Do you mean for us to become more progressive, like you, in the UK? Puulleeease! Give me a break! You guys are going down the tubes -- you've sold out your democratic voting rights with the EU's "Lisbon Treaty." We here do not, so far, have a major Christian religious leader announcing that he believes we ought to accept Sharia Law, as the leader of your Anglican Church did.

Didn't the Police in the U.K. just have to apologize and pay damages for accusing Channel 4 of "Islamophobia" (re their documentary "Undercover Mosque") for exposing the violent hatred preached in many, many (and some of the most prominent) of your Mosques? Why, we wonder here in "non-progressive America," did the U.K. Police, instead of falsely accusing Channel 4, not go after the preachers of violence and hatred?

Is this what you mean by "progressive?"

Take a look at your own country. Perhaps you won't find it so funny.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".