Simon reply to the hard questions & don't hide your face by abusing Islam

Submitted by Nishi (India), May 29, 2008 at 23:38

Dear Intellectual Simon

You wrote, "No we rate by what happened in 911. Yes it's a tragedy that we have had 4000 volunteer soldiers die in Iraq in the span of five years but the 3000 American whom died in 911 in a matter of three hours were not volunteers."

Are your "volnteers" were better human beings than the poor dead People of Afghanistan, Iraq or any such place where rammed your forces. You are also wrong that 3000 people died on 9/11, actually more than 10000 innocent people died, why you are concealing the number of dead from the world. It appears that some thing you are hiding for some ulterior reasons, like the missing GOLD accounting more than 10000 quintels lying in the vaults of some banks in the Tower.

The mystery of two trucks found trapped inside a tunnel in one of the Tower, laden with Gold bars, while moving outside, why in the morning the need arose to move Gold from the vaults of Banks? or it was being moved regularly to evacuate the Gold to save it? How, whether & who are the authorities who were having prior knowledge of attack?

If that be so why not they saved the lives of 3000 ( acoording to you, & 10000 & above according to me), or Gold was more than these lives. It appears you people allwed them to die to have an excuse to attack Iraq & to prpogate to the world that Islam is like this. Simon reply the hard questions & don't hide your face by abusing Islam only. Please read the following, which was neither written by Muslims nor by any Islamist but by Josh Parrish, an American,

"The collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 is one of the more mysterious events that occurred on September 11, 2001. It was not struck by an aircraft as the Twin Towers were and video of the collapse appears to resemble those of buildings brought down by a controlled demolition. These facts have led to speculation that the building was brought down deliberately. Deficient investigations that followed only served to fuel this speculation. _The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted the first official inquiry into the collapse the World Trade Center buildings. The report is merely a collection of supposition and hypotheses arrived at through the examination of photographic evidence and eyewitness interviews. FEMA's reasoning behind the collapse of Building 7 is as follows: Debris from the collapse of the Twin Towers caused structural damage to Building 7 and ignited fires on several different floors; including floors 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 19. There were diesel generators located throughout the building to supply electricity in the event of a power outage. These generators were fed by pressurized fuel lines from large tanks on the lower floors. The falling debris also damaged these pressurized lines and provided a continuous source of fuel for the fires. According to FEMA, neither fire nor structural damage alone would have been sufficient to cause the building's collapse. It was the combination of the structural damage, which diminished the load bearing ability of the structure, and the fire, which weakened the steel, that brought the building down.'

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".