69 million page views

Bush vs. the rest of the world

Reader comment on item: Democrats Unlearn 9/11

Submitted by Andrei Smarandoiu (United States), Jan 9, 2004 at 06:43

Mr. Pipes,

In "Democrats Unlearn 9/11" you state:

"Then came September 11 and a nationwide realization that the country faced not just crime but also a military threat. That very evening, Mr. Bush declared a "war against terrorism." A war, note — not a police action."

So you think a group of 20 people is enough to constitute a "military threat" to the greatest military force in the world ?

I'd like to know how you define a "military threat" ? And for that matter how you define terrorism ? What aspect of the attacks on September 11 was "military" ? Horrible as those attacks were, I fail to see how they differed from other acts of terrorism.

You applaud Bush on his efforts, but if his approach is so effective, how come over two years after the events of September 11 Bush's forces still haven't caught Bin Laden or generally made any progress in reducing terrorist threats to the US ? How come the citizens of this country feel less safe than ever from terrorist attacks ? And please don't tell me Saddam Hussein was a threat to the US. The only reason anyone might have felt that way is due to the Bush Administration's baseless and false propaganda.

The combat against terrorism has to be guided by intelligence - which I think is what Democrats are trying to say - and cannot consist solely of the sort of wholesale and disorganized military attacks Bush has engaged in. His approach only exacerbates the situation and increases anti-American sentiment throughout the Muslim world, not to mention the rest of the world, which is the main problem to begin with.

Andrei Smarandoiu
Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (53) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
we are still at risk ...in 2007 [115 words]Phil GreendJun 16, 2007 22:1898830
Why unlearn only 9/11? [707 words]kkvermaNov 11, 2005 03:0528212
IS the Military learning? [1006 words]WallaceMar 31, 2005 09:2321264
Capitalism -- that's the ticket [41 words]T.Jan 29, 2005 21:3419984
Keep up the good work... [25 words]Eric A. AndersonAug 8, 2004 04:4116263
Let's hope they don't invade [268 words]Scott PearsonMar 17, 2004 02:4814228
The Democrats' Problem [134 words]Peter J. HerzFeb 12, 2004 06:5313856
Pipes at AU [188 words]DONVANJan 21, 2004 12:2113465
The Democrats & 9/11 [223 words]Clem UgorjiJan 19, 2004 09:3213404
Dems naive [83 words]S.C.PandaJan 14, 2004 04:4013357
Do not agree [388 words]Marj LewisJan 12, 2004 18:3913312
We need more like President Bush! [346 words]CarolJan 9, 2004 18:1713271
Afghanistan [84 words]alan smithJan 9, 2004 12:3413268
Bush vs. the rest of the world [274 words]Andrei SmarandoiuJan 9, 2004 06:4313263
Declaration of War [500 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
(Mrs.) Beverly RyanJan 9, 2004 00:1913261
Internationally effective strategies in combatting terrorism [460 words]Daniel ArthurJan 8, 2004 21:0913260
Dems [33 words]Dona WilsonJan 8, 2004 18:4413256
War [63 words]Lester Earl BaconJan 10, 2007 15:5913256
Investigating terrorism [136 words]BCJan 8, 2004 16:4713253
But, wmd? [159 words]john w. mcginleyJan 8, 2004 16:0213251
Comment on Pipes comments [219 words]Steven J. SmithJan 8, 2004 11:4713247
Democrats [179 words]Judy LeBlancJan 8, 2004 10:4413245
Thinking back, is it time to revisit the OKC bombing? [164 words]Ewin BarnettJan 8, 2004 08:4713241
Democrats unlearn 9/11 [57 words]Arthur SagotskyJan 8, 2004 06:5113237
The policy of turning the other cheek [217 words]T.AJan 8, 2004 06:4413236
Date of first anti-American Islamist violence [112 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Avrom Weissman (aka - Avraham Weissman}Jan 8, 2004 04:5513235
Sloan Coffin's History [186 words]Max FriedmanJan 8, 2004 02:1113234
War started in 1979 [180 words]PaulJan 8, 2004 01:2113232
The "WAR" [139 words]PaulJan 7, 2004 23:5113231
2Sirhan Sirhan [40 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
John-Paul PaganoJan 7, 2004 22:2013230
Democrats Unlearn 9/11 [79 words]Delbert S. ButtmanJan 7, 2004 22:0313228
A change in emphasis? [157 words]E. J. BlumbergJan 7, 2004 21:3513227
You are so right [23 words]Sally RogowJan 7, 2004 18:5213222
Democrats Don't forget 9/11 [140 words]Darwin BarrettJan 7, 2004 18:1813217
Democrats Unlearn [110 words]William PapkeJan 7, 2004 15:4513212
Excellent Article [218 words]Osher Doctorow Ph.D.Jan 7, 2004 14:5313211
Democrats Unlearn [41 words]Stephen MachtJan 7, 2004 14:3713208
Sorry, I disagree.. [233 words]John SwedbergJan 7, 2004 14:1913207
Other side of the coin [379 words]James O. HackerJan 7, 2004 14:0513206
the democrats [181 words]susan meyersJan 7, 2004 13:0713201
War against terrorists [43 words]Vijay DandapaniJan 7, 2004 12:2113199
Democrats unlearn 9/11 [44 words]Darold ChampaignJan 7, 2004 11:5413197
What About Pearl Harbor? [65 words]Rudi FrankeJan 7, 2004 11:4713196
The West can't really "lose that war" [218 words]Alain Jean-MairetJan 7, 2004 11:4613195
The Lessons of September 11 [202 words]Arlinda DeAngelisJan 7, 2004 11:2713193
Western Apologists [206 words]BobMikanJan 7, 2004 11:1513192
war on terror [59 words]joseph wylenJan 7, 2004 11:1213191
Democrats Never Learn [66 words]Edward ClineJan 7, 2004 10:5413189
Lazy and spoiled Americans [163 words]Sheila PickerillJan 7, 2004 10:4713188
They have already forgotten [70 words]Marya SteinerJan 7, 2004 10:2613185
Democrats [48 words]William GeorgaquiJan 7, 2004 10:1113184
Dems on War on Terror [252 words]fred lapidesJan 7, 2004 09:4313182
The truth is still being air-brushed. [38 words]V. ThogersenJan 7, 2004 09:3613181

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)