real arguments

Submitted by mz ravin black (United States), Jul 4, 2008 at 15:45

to dhimmi,

the problem with your argument is that as lactantius jr pointed out...allah akbar isn't in the quran, or is any arabic words as you proposed, other than Allah...

arabic is a language that has changed over the years...and it would have been quite easy over 500 years ago to add and change the meaning of a word to suit purposes, which is a very compelling argument in that if Akbar wanted to inflitrate his islamic enemies and slowly take over what better of a way then to have his name mean something else, whereas becoming a chant used to brainwash and supress his enemies...and over time become the main theme in the religion

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".