For Jennifer, Name Calling and Liberals

Submitted by Straight_Talk_Luigi (United States), Jul 8, 2008 at 18:21

Actually, none of what you wrote in that last post is name-calling, you're just disagreeing with the left. I guess I was a little harsh, but I do know of some democrats who like to be in the army.

Unfortunately, many liberals on the far left don't seem to realize the self-destructiveness of their own actions. They are essentially paving the way for the Islam to dominate Western Europe inbetween Portugal and Poland for sure, and perhaps even some of the Canadian Maritime provinces or Ontario.

This is nothing new. Global power has been shifting ever since civilization was formed. China, India, Brazil and the Asian Tigers for sure will all but diminish EU influence and surpass Canada and Australia and Japan with ease at this rate.

I would rather be on the side of a conservative in battle, no question. Why is that? Well, conservatives generally believe in a higher purpose besides getting high or laid. Do some liberals? Yes, but if you are a religious liberal and support entirely secular policies, you're not doing much good. In fact, many folks seem to do this just to prove how tolerant they can be. It's also one reason why they'll vote for Obama this November.

The reason I reference Rome is because secularism is what destroyed the Romans, in my view. Just before the collapse of the Empire, a scandal was found out that involved the sexual exploitation and murder of children in a remote Italian retreat. Word of this spread like fire, and I believe, Jennifer, it was what got the ball rolling.

The Romans were renowned for their skill in battle, but they seemed to have problems with drastic changes in ecosystems. They never really did get a handle on the Scottish Highlands, the Black Forest or the Sarmatians and Scythians of the eastern plains and steppes.

Also, most of the people on the internet (in fact I've never seen this myself) who reference the Bible never talk about the Gentiles who had a mindset similiar to that of the modern-day Western liberal.

It's probably because they no longer exist.

The EU cannot possibly think to be a world power, survive culturally and maintain it's standard of living without having children. And that is what has happened. Our little sex revolution has managed to take procreation out of sex in the last forty years.

It is a dying state that will soon be eclisped and ravel out from the inside out. Oh sure, you may not see a formal declaration of sharia law, you'll just have the most outspoken, belligerent and most motivated people running the show. Those would be Muslim men and Neo-Nazis.

So, in short, I forsee most of the democracies sinking while the enemies of old come storming back. Communism in China, Sharia Law with all the Islamists, and of course the Neo-Nazis.

They will run the show because they are stronger and more willing to fight until the last man.

Thing is Jennifer, some liberals have already given up and accepted defeat. But why? Because it hasn't happened yet. They still have their lifestyle to tend to their wants and needs.

There was plenty of liberal support for communist Russia. Vladmir Lenin referred to Western journalists who sympathsized with his cause as "useful idiots."

How's that for name calling? ^_^

It's true! Think about it hypothetically: you spend 150 K to go to Columbia school of Journalism, think you are educated and above everyone else, and what happens? You become a pan for a madman with another glorious vision .

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".