69 million page views

Most Jews in Israel Oppose a Palestinan State

Reader comment on item: Obama and Netanyahu Meet: What's Next?

Submitted by Prof, Paul Eidelberg (Israel), May 17, 2009 at 17:35

I have serious doubts about the contention that a majority of Israel's Jewish population favors the so-called "two-state solution to the Palestinian conflict." Let's examine contrary evidence drawn from three sources: demonstrations, opinion polls, and election results.

On September 7, 1993, one week before the September 13 signing of the Israel-PLO Declaration of Principles (hereafter referred to as "Oslo"), some 450,000 Jews assembled in Jerusalem and demonstrated against that agreement. Yona Presburg documents more compelling evidence in his monumental work, Ruach Acheret (Another Spirit), which graphically displays how Jews in virtually every city and town in Israel held vigorous demonstrations against Oslo, year after year after year.

Now consider the results of two elections. In the February 2001 election, Ariel Sharon received 62.4% of the votes cast. This was a landslide victory over Ehud Barak who had offered Yasser Arafat 95% of Judea and Samaria including the Old City and the Temple Mount. True, the "West Bank" was not the only issue in that election, since Arafat had launched his terror war the previous September. Nevertheless, Sharon's stunning victory indicates that most Israeli's opposed Labor's territory-for-peace policy.

Moreover, in the January 2003 election, the parties opposed to Labor's policy of "unilateral disengagement" from Gaza won 84 Knesset seats. Since disengagement was the paramount issue of that election, the election was tantamount to a national referendum.

Turning to public opinion polls, consider how Jews answered the following questions:

Ÿ "If Israel had to choose between peace and annexation of the territories held since the 1967 war which would you choose?" 54% chose annexation (July 1984).

Ÿ "In peace negotiations with the Arabs, Israel should suggest territorial compromise against suitable security guarantees." 54% disagreed (September 1986).

A survey conducted during the 1992 Knesset election campaign reported that no less than 55% of Israel's Jewish population – excluding the Jewish residents of Judea, Samaria, and Gaza – agreed that these areas ought to "remain under Israeli rule, even if this meant hindering the peace process" (emphasis added). Only 33% favored "land for peace". No wonder the Labor Party campaigned against negotiations with the PLO. Once entrenched in office, however, Labor betrayed its pledge to the nation.

Now consider a poll commissioned by the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) and the Independent Media Review and Analysis (IMRA). The poll, reported in The Jerusalem Post on June 7, 2002, asked four questions:

1. "Do you support the proposal that Israel withdraw to the pre-Six Day War lines and agree to the establishment of a Palestinian state in return for peace...?" Jews: 56% against.

2. "If it were possible to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, would you support, or oppose the establishment of a Palestinian state?" Jews 66% against.

3. "Do you support the proposal that Israel withdraw to the pre-Six Day War lines – including the Golan, the Jordan Rift Valley, the Old City of Jerusalem – and agree to the establishment of a Palestinian state in return for peace...?" Jews: 80% against.

4. "Do you support the proposal that Israel withdraw to the pre-Six Day War lines – including the Golan, the Jordan Valley, the Old City of Jerusalem, and agree to the establishment of a Palestinian state – and allow Palestinian refugees the right of return to Israel instead of receiving compensation – in return for peace with the Palestinians?" Jews: 93% against.

The results of this poll indicate that a large percentage of Jews, whether motivated by religious or cultural convictions, are wedded to the Land of Israel and oppose sacrificing part of it for peace. The poll also revealed that the more Jews are made aware of the strategic assets Israel must surrender for "peace" – and I have not mentioned the loss of crucial water resources and increased vulnerability to missile attacks – the more they oppose a Palestinian state. Clearly, most Jews in Israel do not really believe they will obtain peace by yielding Jewish land to the Palestinian Arabs.

Despite the incessant propaganda of Israel's leftwing dominated media, a poll published by Independent Media Review Analysis on May 18, 2007 reported that clear majorities of Israeli Jews believe Palestinian Arabs want to destroy Israel and reject land-for-peace deals as well as unilateral concessions to Palestinian Arabs.

Incidentally, Jewish skepticism about Palestinian Arabs extends to Israel's own Arab citizens. A University of Haifa poll released on June 21, 2004 revealed that 64% of the Jewish public in Israel believes that the government should encourage Israeli Arabs to emigrate. 55% said Israeli Arabs endanger national security, while 45% said they support revoking Israeli Arabs' right to vote and hold political office.

If a majority of the Jews in Israel distrust Israel's Arab citizens—and polls indicate that most of these Arabs identify with the "Palestinians"—I find it hard to believe that a majority of Israel's Jewish population supports the establishment of an Arab Islamic state in Judea and Samaria. I therefore suspect tendentiousness in any studies to the contrary.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I linked in the article to the weblog entry where my statistics came from.

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (69) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Historical Implications of Failing to be Israel's Friend [490 words]M. ToveyJun 3, 2009 12:17156610
Obama and Mobarak meet in Cairo: What's next [138 words]M IbrahimMay 31, 2009 21:49156497
The Real Issue [125 words]michael rosenbergMay 31, 2009 02:49156427
The feeling amongst my own folk [360 words]Seamus MacNemiMay 31, 2009 00:37156419
Potentially Catastrophic American Administrative Error for Not Remembering that Israel's Strength is America's Strength [294 words]M. ToveyMay 28, 2009 14:00156308
The Unique Solution [114 words]Ismael Pio EliasMay 24, 2009 01:34156073
Please tell me, why the mayors in local gov't all accross America have met with Saudi A. officials?? [236 words]MargaretMay 21, 2009 17:10155939
The meeting of a closed mind to the galant PM of Israel. [352 words]Margaret HoodMay 21, 2009 17:00155937
Israel has already started to think for itself. [162 words]Isaac HaskiyaMay 21, 2009 12:41155913
2012 Elections in the U.S. [87 words]Renee BouvierMay 20, 2009 16:45155865
President Obama has agreed to allow six gitmo detainees temporary asylum at the White House! [81 words]pdmMay 20, 2009 13:14155858
I protest- how dare any foreign leader tell Israels leaders what to do [1552 words]Tess McNamara Australian and Political commentator realistMay 20, 2009 03:51155832
Obama and Netanyahu meet [131 words]Jerald K. RomeMay 19, 2009 20:08155806
It dose not help [165 words]Christian MohamadMay 19, 2009 19:06155801
Two State Solution for Now [50 words]Donna SMay 19, 2009 18:49155798
Solidified by Bill Clinton [90 words]Alan FoxMay 19, 2009 16:11155792
Special relationship [83 words]Peter BorregardMay 19, 2009 15:19155789
Wrong, he does have a special relationship [90 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDJun 16, 2009 03:50155789
obama >carter? [170 words]barryMay 19, 2009 14:26155787
Someone Stick a Fork in..... [121 words]BlackspeareMay 18, 2009 22:32155743
What about George W? and Clinton, really? [278 words]saraMay 18, 2009 19:44155736
Actually, you forgot Bush Sr. [88 words]JayJun 21, 2009 21:41155736
Obama's aims [296 words]pete murrayMay 18, 2009 15:06155721
Mr. President - Israel Will Not Go Softly into That 'Two State' Solution Night [522 words]M. ToveyMay 18, 2009 14:00155717
Will Obama mislead PM Netanyahu too? [104 words]M.D'SouzaMay 18, 2009 12:17155710
Why not say that there is already a Palestinian state called Jordan [124 words]MHLMay 18, 2009 10:52155701
palestine [92 words]SamuelMay 19, 2009 12:41155701
One too many [44 words]IanusMay 19, 2009 12:51155701
Jordan IS Palestine ! [56 words]larry KosbergMay 23, 2009 19:46155701
No Peace at Israel's Expense, Mr President - Peace Will Cost More than a 'Palestinian' State [438 words]M. ToveyJun 2, 2009 18:53155701
History is not kind with the ones who were friendly to Israel [382 words]Debanjan BanerjeeJun 15, 2009 01:54155701
Nations Rise and Fall Throughout History at the Will of Almighty God - Seek the Truth of Almighty God for Personal Understanding [513 words]M. ToveyJun 15, 2009 19:49155701
My answer to Mr. Tovey [221 words]Debanjan BanerjeeJun 20, 2009 11:41155701
Salvation Comes by Faith - Not by Good Works - Even that of Kings [649 words]M. ToveyJun 22, 2009 12:53155701
Still more confusion remains Mr. Tovey , Kindly help me [398 words]Debanjan BanerjeeJun 24, 2009 12:18155701
Seek the Truth of Jesus Christ and His Understanding to Clear Confusion About His WORD [1055 words]M. ToveyJun 25, 2009 12:23155701
2The Truth [616 words]UnknownOct 5, 2012 00:46155701
2The Gospel Truth: How To Be Saved [219 words]UnknownMar 24, 2013 18:48155701
1Correction Of Thessalonians 4:14 [18 words]UnknownApr 1, 2014 20:29155701
The Gospel Truth [92 words]Edward Wilcock (86)May 17, 2014 12:05155701
How will the Palestinians explain peace? [225 words]howiemMay 18, 2009 10:02155699
What about the US's Arab friends ? [244 words]jon, a Brit in EurolandMay 18, 2009 03:58155676
1Obama: A Curse [773 words]Bill KALOGONISMay 18, 2009 01:46155669
Please, read the Bible [96 words]Jung IndonesiaJun 10, 2009 13:18155669
Please, read the Bible [96 words]Jung IndonesiaJun 10, 2009 13:19155669
Should Israel Attack Iran First? [178 words]Ron GerskupMay 18, 2009 01:10155668
My answer to you Mr. Gerskup [40 words]Seamus MacNemiMay 31, 2009 01:00155668
Obama and Netanyahu meet [400 words]Mike GhouseMay 17, 2009 23:26155666
Mike Ghouse, the new historian [498 words]InfidelMay 19, 2009 19:51155666
I see no change [12 words]Firozali A.MullaMay 17, 2009 20:29155655
Most Jews in Israel Oppose a Palestinan State [830 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Prof, Paul EidelbergMay 17, 2009 17:35155640
AGREED [42 words]CAROLMay 18, 2009 03:11155640
Judas goat [69 words]Samuel StephensMay 17, 2009 17:34155639
Obama and Netanyahu Meet: What Next? The Whole World is Watching [166 words]Anne USAMay 17, 2009 16:24155630
US israel relations [90 words]Janusz KowalikMay 17, 2009 15:29155625
These are Indeed Interesting Times [119 words]John W McGinleyMay 17, 2009 13:14155614
Collision Course: Israel and America [326 words]Rodney DezarnMay 17, 2009 13:03155612
If Obama pushes Israel [46 words]Seamus MacNemiMay 17, 2009 20:22155612
Pre-emptive strike [44 words]SamuelMay 19, 2009 12:46155612
Personally I have little faith in Obama [68 words]Seamus MacNemiMay 17, 2009 13:01155611
Sure destruction [42 words]The last prophetMay 17, 2009 12:56155610
That Obama is more hostile to Israel than was Bush, is at this point, beside the point [194 words]Steve KleinMay 17, 2009 12:46155609
There are no more Israeli concessions available [357 words]Ken BesigMay 17, 2009 12:46155608
Say nay to the naysayers. [90 words]hyman peskinMay 17, 2009 12:41155606
Advice to Israel [39 words]Anatoly TsaliovichMay 17, 2009 12:26155603
left wing smell(yellow) [61 words]SamuelMay 19, 2009 12:53155603
Advice to Israel [156 words]RayJun 16, 2009 17:53155603
You omit the Muslim angle [118 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDMay 17, 2009 12:23155602
Netanyahu [68 words]DonMay 17, 2009 11:06155600

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)