The Swiss takes revenge on themselves: Incest and Minerets

Submitted by Salah Ali (Norway), Dec 10, 2009 at 01:14

This is evident aggression. The ban on minerats in Switzerland targets archiecture and expresses a deep hatred to Islam and Moslems. Churches also have special features both spacial and decorative that express Christianity, would Moslems ban the building of churches then in response to this erratic and unreasoning act? Moreover, Christianity is Semitic religion started in Moslem lands and Christians were in the East before Christianity and its architectural representations were introduced and adopted by the Europeans. Why then the particularization of minerates. My explanation is that Swiss has no Alph letter to stand for straightforwardness and integrity in its language. It had the pornography and scandals such as that of the incesteous father immoral rapes. Europe should be ashamed from such dirty acts committed while they forget any trace of man's dignity and faith. To cover up this scandal of (a father, a husband no one can tell?) and others, The Swiss devoloped a phalicphobia instead, imagining minerates to be similar in shape, and unconsciously they attacked their own shameful acts by imagining this symbol of human honour and dignity in their own dispicable imaging to bear such similarity in shape.

Do not blame our holy warriors now to destroy churches and hunt down Christians in volatile places as Lebanon, Iran and Iraq. This reaction is slow, but certain and you will see the damages churches and christians will get soon. Moreover, Europeans claim to be aware of motivations that create hatred and ignite violence, why then the supposedly wise commits such a foolish act. Swiss ban only adds fuel to fire...Will the ban include the pyramids and places like istanbul and Taj Mahal, What about the minerate of Alexandria one of the wonders built by a Macdonian and the many Cleopatras needles....You Swiss are fool!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".