different opinions

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Dec 19, 2009 at 01:04

Mr. A.Ad Rawi, writing from the infidel land of Norway writes:

"Public opinion is increasingly tilting towards hatred of immigrants especially these from Islamic countries. "
Not so much immigrants - but they are against the division that non-integrating muslims create in their previously relatively harmonious socieies. There is no getting around it - the bottom line is Islam is increasingly on the nose to many people. Why is that? Well, for one thing its PR campaign over the last 20 years or so hasn't been entirely successful has it. You'll just have to accept that many non-muslim people just don't like it and never will. And that was BEFORE Lockerbie, 9/11, Beslan, Madrid, London tube, Bali, Beslan and all the other tragedies.

"European must either depart from international agreements on refugees or decline to accept new refugees. "
Yes, they could do both.

"This runs counter to their democracy. Then Europe will have a different label...A return to fascisim "
But why cry about democracy when you don't really like it anyway? Laws can and do change according to the situation inside a territory. If it is necessary - then the laws will change. This has always been the case - especially in times of crisis.

"in view as voices of Greet wilders win more audience."
Geert Wilders - who put together the movie Fitna' - which just included verbatim statements from the Koran? Which bits didn't you like? Apart from that - all he does is express his opinion - that Islam is bad news for holland and Europe in general. Just as you express the opposite view no doubt. This is part of democrcay. Different opinions are alowed to exist. Or would you say that you and others like you would dearly like viewpoints which don't coincide with your own to be stifled. The trouble is most people do not agree that your cult is worth following. No need to get angry about it - just accept that other cultures do not HAVE to accept Islam.

"The result clearly is back to Clash of Culture concept. But are you sure Nations like Islam can be removed from the planet"

Islam is not a nation - it is an anachronistic political system base around an interpretation of a 7th century Middle eastern derived 'religion'. It doesn't have to be removed - just exposed for the sham that it is. Far more powerful and effective philosophies/religions exist.

" or that the Muslims will not come in possession of power to regain their past power and build their own life!"
Muslims can do that right now if they wish. But hopefully they'll make use of infidel invented technologies to make their recreation of their past power a little more palatable. What would be really helpful is if they sat down and asked themeslevs seriously - what is the one thing common to all Muslim cultures that is holding them back?

" 99% of your hypothetical cries against this great religion go unheard by Muslims and those who know your language gives lip-service and are more and more attached to their culture."
I think most people are aware of their duplicity and that appealing to muslim sensibilities is a complete waste of time.

"They are very proud, aggressive and synical."
Admirable qualities all, developed no doubt by association with Islam.
Also very disorganised, myopic and predictable.

" If you keep attacking them and are caught in the open, you will get Perleskoni punch on face"
Oh yes, the fact that many of them are thugs in small groups has not gone unnoticed. But one on one - they are complete cowards.

"and you will learn not to attack your superior in heart, mind, morals and culture. "
An arab master race? Very wishful thinking on your part but I'm afraid, completely delusional. But you have to have some ace to hold don't you? I guess an imaginary one helps.

Speaking of the 'superior culture' etc - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1824455.stm

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".